Water A WELLography™
First Edition
International Well Building Institute

Table of Contents

Copyright

Copyright© 2017 International WELL Building Institute PBC. All rights reserved.

International WELL Building Institute PBC authorizes personal use of this Water WELLography™, which includes the ability by the user to download and print a single copy of the Water WELLography™ for the user’s own education and reference. In exchange for this authorization, the user agrees:

  1. not to remove any copyright or other proprietary notices contained in the Water WELLography™;

  2. not to modify the Water WELLography™; and

  3. not to sell, reproduce, display or distribute the Water WELLography™ in any way for any public or commercial purpose. If you are interested in reproducing, displaying or distributing the Water WELLography™ for any public or commercial use, please contact info@wellcertified.com at International WELL Building Institute PBC.

Unauthorized use of the Water WELLography™ violates copyright, trademark, and other laws and is prohibited.

Credits

The International WELL Building Institute also acknowledges the important work of Melcher Media in bringing this document to market in its current state.

Produced By:

Melcher Media
124 West 13th Street
New York, NY 10011
www.melcher.com

President, CEO: Charles Melcher
VP, COO: Bonnie Eldon
Creative Producer: Katy Yudin
Senior Digital Producer: Shannon Fanuko
Associate Editor: Luisa Lizoain
Assistant Editor: Karl Daum

Design & Development by Crush + Lovely

Illustrations by Kaarina Mackenzie

Animations by Vita Newstetter

Melcher Media would like to thank Callie Barlow, Jess Bass, David Brown, Dylan Butman, Tova Carlin, Maria Gagliano, Barbara Gogan, Luke Jarvis, Weronika Jurkiewicz, David Kahn, Susan Lynch, Sami Melcher, John Morgan, Lauren Nathan, Julia Sourikoff, Tori Spencer, Saif Tase, Zoe Valella, and Megan Worman.

Acknowledgements

The International WELL Building Institute (IWBI) and Delos Living LLC (Delos) acknowledge the work of the following IWBI and Delos technical staff that developed and created the WELLographies: Oriah Abera; Niklas Garrn; Trevor Granger; Soyoung Hwang; Michelle Martin; Vienna McLeod; Anja Mikic; Renu Nadkarni; Brendan O’Grady; Chris Ramos; Eric Saunders; Sara Scheineson; Nathan Stodola; Regina Vaicekonyte; Sarah Welton; Kylie Wheelock; and Emily Winer.

IWBI also is grateful for the input and insight provided by the following Subject Matter Experts:

Air: Terry Gordon, PhD; Eric Liberda, PhD; Tim McAuley, PhD; Ellen Tohn, MCP

Water: Eric Liberda, PhD; Tim McAuley, PhD; Margret Whittaker, PhD, MPH, CBiol, FSB, ERB, DABT, ToxServices LLC

Nourishment: Sharon Akabas, PhD; Alice H. Lichtenstein, DSc; Barbara Moore, PhD

Light: Chad Groshart, LEED AP BD+C; Samer Hattar, PhD; Steven Lockley, PhD, Consultant, Delos Living LLC and Member, Well Living Lab Scientific Advisory Board, Neuroscientist, Brigham and Women’s Hospital and Associate Professor of Medicine, Harvard Medical School

Fitness: Dr. Karen Lee, MD, MHSc, FRCPC, President & CEO, Dr. Karen Lee Health + Built Environment + Social Determinants Consulting; Jordan Metzl, MD

Thermal Comfort: Alan Hedge, PhD, CPE, CErgHF; David Lehrer, MArch; Caroline Karmann, PhD, MArch

Acoustics: Arline L. Bronzaft, PhD, Professor Emerita of The City University of New York; Charles Salter, PE

Materials: Clayton Cowl, MD; Matteo Kausch, PhD, Cradle to Cradle Products Innovation Institute; Megan Schwarzman, MD, MPH; Margret Whittaker, PhD, MPH, CBiol, FSB, ERB, DABT, ToxServices LLC

Mind: Anjali Bhagra, MBBS; Lisa Cohen, PhD; Keith Roach, MD; John Salamone, PhD; Nelida Quintero, PhD

Disclaimer

None of the parties involved in the funding or creation of the WELL Building Standard™ and the WELLographies™, including Delos Living LLC, its affiliates, subsidiaries, members, employees, or contractors, assume any liability or responsibility to the user or any third parties for the accuracy, completeness, or use of or reliance on any information contained in the WELL Building Standard and the WELLographies, or for any injuries, losses, or damages (including, without limitation, equitable relief) arising from such use or reliance.

Although the information contained in the WELL Building Standard and the WELLographies is believed to be reliable and accurate, all materials set forth within are provided without warranties of any kind, either express or implied, including but not limited to warranties of the accuracy or completeness of information or the suitability of the information for any particular purpose.

The WELL Building Standard and the WELLographies are intended to educate and assist building and real estate professionals in their efforts to create healthier work and living spaces, and nothing in the WELL Building Standard and the WELLographies should be considered, or used as a substitute for, medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

As a condition of use, the user covenants not to sue and agrees to waive and release Delos Living LLC, its affiliates, subsidiaries, members, employees, or contractors from any and all claims, demands, and causes of action for any injuries, losses, or damages (including, without limitation, equitable relief) that the user may now or hereafter have a right to assert against such parties as a result of the use of, or reliance on, the WELL Building Standard and the WELLographies.

Welcome to WELL

The buildings where we live, work, learn and relax have a profound effect on our well-being: how we feel, what we eat and how we sleep at night. By examining our surroundings and our habits, and making key optimizations and changes, we have the power to cultivate spaces that promote wellness, and support efforts to live healthier, active, mindful lives – a right for every human.

The WELL Building Standard™ (WELL) envisions this reality and opens this critical dialogue. It provides a roadmap and a comprehensive set of strategies for achieving building and communities that advance human health.

WELL consists of a comprehensive set of features across seven concepts (Air, Water, Light, Nourishment, Fitness, Comfort and Mind). Together, these components address the various individual needs of the people inside buildings, while also setting forth a common foundation for measuring wellness in buildings as a whole. The standard was developed by integrating scientific research and literature on environmental health, behavioral factors, health outcomes and demographic risk factors that affect health; with leading practices in building design and management. WELL also references existing standards and best practice guidelines set by governmental and professional organizations, where available, in order to clarify and harmonize existing thresholds and requirements.

The result is the premier building standard for advancing human health and wellness – and a blueprint for creating better buildings that can enhance productivity, health and happiness for people everywhere.

How to Use this WELLography™

WELLographies™ present research relevant to health and well-being in buildings and communities. The sources included span health, wellness, and scientific and professional literature specific to the seven concepts within WELL, and other core focus areas. WELLographies are meant to complement the WELL Building Standard™ (available at standard.wellcertified.com) and provide architects, building managers, engineers, and interior designers, among others, with health- and science-focused background to support and guide their efforts to advance the healthy buildings movement.

WELLographies have three primary goals:

  1. Provide background information for key topics relevant to understanding human health as it relates to the built environment.
  2. Synthesize and present the science that underpins the WELL Building Standard™.
  3. Outline specific, evidence-based strategies that building professionals can apply to create spaces that promote health and well-being in buildings and communities.

There are nine WELLographies:

  1. Air
  2. Water
  3. Nourishment
  4. Light
  5. Fitness
  6. Thermal Comfort
  7. Acoustics
  8. Materials
  9. Mind

The Water WELLography™ has the following sections:

Water and the Built Environment, which broadly describes how water quality and access to safe drinking water relates to the human experience in buildings.

Properties of Water, which describes key metrics, measures, and regulatory frameworks for water quality at a systems scale.

Water and the Human Body, which provides an explanation of the biological mechanisms that depend on adequate hydration, describing how the body functions under normal, healthy conditions.

Elements of Water, which describes environmental conditions or behaviors that are linked to health, focus, or occupant comfort, and that are subject to interventions in building design or policy. Each element includes coverage of associated health effects as well as solutions, interventions that can be implemented to impact the element. Some solutions may address several different elements.

Explanations of Solutions, which provides a definition and/or more detail for each solution.

Introduction

Water is essential for human life. More than half of the human body is composed of water. It is a significant component of cells and serves as the medium of transport for nutrients and waste in the body.1

It is recommended that adults consume approximately 2.7 L (91 oz) to 3.7 L (125 oz) of water per day from sources including drinking water, other beverages and food.2 This quantity is meant to offset the amount of water that leaves the body through respiration, perspiration, and excretion, thereby preventing dehydration and its adverse health effects.

Clean water is critical for maintaining health and preventing disease. We need water daily to hydrate our bodies, prepare foods, cleanse our environment, and perform a wide range of other daily activities. However, the quality of the water that sustains us depends on many factors. Water is vulnerable to contamination by biological, chemical, and radioactive pollutants and is also susceptible to contaminants from industry, agriculture, and water treatment/distribution systems. Corrosion and leaching of plumbing systems in the form of lead, iron, copper and other contaminants can also threaten access to clean water. Pollutants that enter the drinking water supply at distribution centers can spread, potentially affecting populations across large geographic areas. Water treatment at the municipal level may not adequately capture all of the impurities associated with water born health risks. This is particularly true for emerging contaminants, which are not always addressed by conventional treatment technologies or methods. However, it is possible to reduce the levels of many contaminants in our water through building-level interventions. For example, ultraviolet sanitation can be implemented to remove a wide range of microorganisms in water while various filters can be put in place to remove potentially harmful substances, such as activated carbon, sediment, birm, greensand, and reverse osmosis filters.

Despite the sophisticated water treatment systems available today, drinking water contamination is a major public health issue at both the national and global level.

Sources of drinking water contamination in the United States (U.S.) includes various byproducts of agricultural practices, urbanization, and industrialization among others.3 Globally, water contamination statistics are also concerning and pose unique threats to many communities. The World Health Organization (WHO) reports that at least 1.8 billion people use a drinking water source contaminated with feces, with more than 500,000 diarrheal deaths caused by contaminated water each year.4

Figure 1: Sources of contaminants in drinking water.5 6 7
expand this figure

Contamination of centralized purification and distribution systems can result in rapid, severe, and far-reaching consequences when water pollution events occur, even in a country with a well-developed water distribution and sanitation network like the U.S.8 As an example, the 1993 Cryptosporidium outbreak in Milwaukee, Wisconsin caused at least 69 deaths (primarily confined to immunocompromised individuals). The source of this outbreak was traced to one of the city’s filtration plants, where operators temporarily lost control of the filtration process and allowed Cryptosporidium through the plant’s filters and into the city’s water mains.8

In addition to primary filtration in centralized water treatment plants, secondary filtration and purification may be needed in some cases at the building level. The need for additional filtration or purification is due primarily to three factors. First, microbiological contaminants can be reintroduced to the water supply if the disinfection does not produce a lasting effect. Second, additional pollutants often contaminate water sources despite the use of primary and secondary filtration.9 Finally, chemicals introduced to the water supply as part of the centralized treatment processes may produce harmful byproducts, some of which are shown to have carcinogenic properties.10

The Water WELLography™ provides a brief description of the compounds identified by established regulatory and advisory organizations as the most common water pollutants. These pollutants include inorganic and organic chemicals, biological contaminants that may enter the water supply unintentionally, as well as chemicals and minerals – such as chlorine and fluoride – that municipalities add to the water supply intentionally for their beneficial disinfectant and health properties. The pollutants discussed are regulated under several sets of regulatory guidelines: the EPA’s Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) and Secondary Drinking Water Guidelines (SDWG), Canadian Drinking Water Guidelines, California’s Public Health Goals (CAPHG), the Australian Drinking Water Guidelines, and the New York State Department of Health’s Maximum Contaminant Levels, among others. The pollutants profiled here are chosen based on a combination of their potential adverse health effects and their documented presence at significant levels in U.S. drinking water supplies.

Water and the Built Environment

Given the various sources of pollution our water is exposed to on its path from source to tap, it is paramount that we make sure the water we drink is clean and uncontaminated.

According to UNICEF and WHO, 663 million people still do not have access to improved water sources.11 In an effort to address this, The United Nations Sustainable Development Goal for environmental sustainability includes a target for water: “By 2030, achieve universal and equitable access to safe and affordable drinking water for all.”12

Water treatment plants and facilities take great care in conditioning water, yet despite their efforts, the water delivered to homes, offices, and other points of use may become contaminated en route post-treatment.13 Common points of weakness in infrastructure include leaks, pressure losses, extended residence times, leaching from agricultural and manufacturing processes and facilities, and various other elements including construction and managing changes in weather.13

Properties of Water

The following section highlights key components of the regulatory framework for water contaminants and defines the metrics used in drinking water standards.

Regulatory Framework for Contaminant Management

Drinking water contaminant guidelines are primarily based on toxicity tests in laboratory animals (or in a few cases, epidemiological studies in humans) that identify a specific concentration of a substance that is toxic. However, there are many steps between the toxic concentrations tested in a laboratory and the policy that leads to the implementation of water quality guidelines.

The EPA uses a range of standards to regulate contaminants found in water based on substance toxicity, enforced through the National Primary Drinking Water Regulations and the National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations.14

Regulatory Process

Contaminants in potable water are regulated under the Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA).15 The SDWA is a federal law that was passed in 1974, amended in 1986, and again in 1996. The SDWA establishes standards to protect the quality of drinking water in the U.S. from naturally occurring and human-made contaminants. The SDWA authorizes the EPA to oversee the implementation and maintenance of those standards in states, localities and public water suppliers. Rivers, lakes, reservoirs, springs, and ground water wells (except private wells serving fewer than 25 people) are drinking water sources that fall under the scope of protection by the SDWA.15 The EPA divides the regulations dealing with drinking water into Primary and Secondary standards.16

National Primary Drinking Water Regulations

National Primary Drinking Water Regulations (NPDWRs), or primary standards, are legally-enforceable standards set by the EPA and apply to all public water systems in the country.17 NPDWRs limit the allowable level of specific contaminants found or anticipated to be found in drinking water that can adversely affect public health. Primary standards consist of MCLs, Treatment Techniques (TT), and Maximum Contaminant Level Goals (MCLGs).17 Currently, the EPA regulates 87 substances, listing 81 MCLGs, 77 MCLs, and 10 TTs in the U.S.17

National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations

National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations (NSDWRs), also known as secondary standards, are non-enforceable standards set by the EPA to guide the use of contaminants that can have cosmetic (such as skin or tooth discoloration) or aesthetic (taste, odor, color) effects when consumed.18 While the EPA cannot require any water supply systems to comply with secondary standards, states can elect to adopt EPA NSDWRs as enforceable standards.18

Maximum Contaminant Level Goals (MCLGs)

MCLGs are non-enforceable public health goals that identify maximum level of contaminants in drinking water at which there are “no known or anticipated adverse effect(s) on the health of an individual”.16 When determining MCLGs, the EPA tightens the margins of safety to protect vulnerable populations, including children and those who are immunocompromised and are therefore at a higher risk of experiencing adverse health effects from exposure.16 MCLGs do not consider the technological capabilities of detection and treatment and are, at times, set at levels unattainable by current water supply systems.19 Currently, there are 83 MCLGs listed by the EPA for the U.S.19

Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs)

Contaminant levels below MCLG are considered ideal, but the EPA recognizes that reaching these levels may be extremely expensive or even impossible to attain in specific areas.19 Therefore, the EPA sets Maximum Contaminant Levels (MCLs) defined as enforceable limits that all water suppliers are required to meet. The MCL and MCLG are often equal for many contaminants. However, the goal for carcinogens is zero; as it is assumed that no known amount has proven to be safe. Currently, there are 77 MCLs in the U.S.19

Treatment Techniques (TT)

It can be difficult, either technically or financially, to accurately quantify the amount of a chemical present in a sample. For these cases, the EPA has issued treatment techniques (TT) for the removal of specific chemicals to ensure that levels present in the water supply remain within levels considered safe for consumption.20 The EPA requires that the best technology is used to treat large water systems, while smaller systems can use a compliant and more affordable equivalent. Some examples of TT’s include the Surface Water Treatment Rule, the Lead and Copper Rule, and Acrylamide and Epichlorohydrin Rules.20

State Water Safety Requirements

The SDWA empowers EPA to set maximum levels for contaminants in drinking water, but this authority does not preclude states and cities from creating their own, more restrictive limits for specific contaminants. For example, the New York State Department of Health uses binding limits for several contaminants that only have non-enforceable EPA limits (which are known as Health Advisories).21 A variety of state regulations and guidelines will be used throughout this WELLography to illustrate certain state-mandated contaminant restrictions that are stricter than national guidelines.

Categorization of Water Contaminants

The EPA classifies contaminants into the following categories: microorganisms, disinfectants, disinfectant byproducts, inorganic chemicals, organic chemicals, and radionuclides.22

Microorganisms

The microorganisms category includes all non-chemical living plant or animal pathogens and microorganisms.19 Examples would be organisms such as Cryptosporidium, Giardia lamblia, and Legionella, and would also include total bacterial coliforms. MCLGs are set at zero for microbial contaminants under the assumption that ingesting even one protozoan, virus, or bacterium may result in adverse health effects.19

Chemical Contaminants

This category includes a broad range of chemicals including water disinfectants such as chlorine, disinfection byproducts such as trihalomethanes, inorganic chemicals such as metals, and organic chemicals such as pesticides.19 Chemical contaminants are categorized based on carcinogenicity (ability to cause cancer) for risk assessment. When there is evidence that a contaminant could be carcinogenic, and there is no dose below which the chemical is considered safe, the EPA sets the MCLG at zero.19

Radionuclides

Radionuclides are unstable isotopes (imbalanced atoms) that emit energy in an attempt to reach a stable state, commonly known as radioactive decay.23 MCLGs for radionuclides are set to zero, as they are considered carcinogenic, or harmful to health by ionization.19

Defining Contaminant Levels and Regulations

Drinking water levels for chemical contaminants are extrapolated from reference doses (RfDs) or cancer slope factors (CSFs). Most RfDs and CSFs are published by the EPA through the Integrated Risk and Information System (IRIS).24 Traditionally, RfDs have been based on either the Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level (LOAEL) or the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) assigned from animal studies.25 More recently, RfDs have been based on the Benchmark Dose (BMD), which is “the dose or concentration that produces a predetermined change in response rate of an adverse effect (called the benchmark response or BMR) compared to background”.25 Specifics relating to the RfD, CSF, and LOAEL are detailed below.

Cancer Slope Factor

In assessing the toxic nature of a chemical, the EPA uses an additional estimate known as the cancer slope factor, or just slope factor (SF).24 The cancer slope factor estimates “the risk of cancer associated with exposure to a carcinogenic or potentially carcinogenic substance.” This estimate of risk is presented in units of proportion (of a population) affected over a lifetime per milligram of a substance per kilogram of body weight per day.24 The SF is typically used when referring to lower doses or the lower region of a dose-response curve (that is, where exposure corresponds to a risk less than one in 100).26

Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level

The Lowest Observed Adverse Effect Level is the smallest amount of a given substance that has been proven to lead to an adverse health effect.27 The LOAEL is usually measured in mass of toxin per mass of subject per time (mg/kg/day). For example, tests on groups of 0.5 kg rats showed that 125 mg/day of caprolactam (a toxin) was the lowest amount that created adverse effects when consumed, so the LOAEL is 250 mg/kg/day, once the weight of the rats is taken into consideration.28

No Observed Adverse Effect Level

The highest dose shown to not lead to adverse health effects is the No Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL), which may or may not be related to the LOAEL.27 The NOAEL is the dose that presents no adverse biological effect on the test subject. Using the previous example, the largest dose of caprolactam that imparted no adverse effects on rats was 25 mg/day, so the NOAEL is 50 mg/kg/day, once the weight of the rats is taken into consideration.29

The 16th-century physician Paracelsus noted that it is the dose that makes the poison.30

Reference Dose

Acute or short-term effects may rapidly occur when exposed to an irritant or toxin and subside with the removal of the exposure agent.30 Conversely, chronic effects are the result of daily or regular exposure over a much longer time period. Given that water is consumed frequently throughout the day, it is capable of eliciting both chronic and acute effects.30

The RfD is an estimated daily amount of a chemical that, if exposed, is not expected to lead to adverse health effects over a lifetime.31 This measurement includes uncertainty factors to account for sensitive populations and quality of data.31 RfD levels are typically 100 to 1,000 times less than those shown to lead to adverse effects in the animals used in tests, but the units are still expressed in milligrams of substance per kilograms of consumer body weight per day.32 Units are changed to milligrams of substance per liter of water (mg/L) to transform a RfD level into a meaningful concentration for water quality tests (such as an MCLG). In order to do this, the RfD is multiplied by the average human body weight (70 kg) and divided by daily water consumption (set at two liters per day by the EPA) (Figure 2). However, water is not the only way humans encounter chemicals, and the cumulative exposure should be taken into consideration for chemicals found ubiquitously throughout our environments.32

Figure 2: EXAMPLE MCLG CALCULATION FOR CAPROLACTUM IN DRINKING WATER.20
expand this figure

Water and the Human Body

The Institute of Medicine (IOM) recommends daily water consumption of 2.7 L (91 oz) for women and 3.7 L (125 oz) for men from sources including drinking water, other beverages and food.2

Approximately 20% of this recommended amount typically comes from food intake and the remaining 80% from other sources such as beverages.33 The recommended daily water intake corresponds to 5 to 10% of the 14 gallons of water present in the body and replaces water lost through breathing, sweat, and excretion.

Water is necessary for life and is required for most body functions, including maintaining cell health and integrity; helping to eliminate byproducts and waste from the body, lubricating and cushioning joints, and carrying nutrients and oxygen to cells, among other functions (Figure 3).34 Once water enters the body, much of it will be readily absorbed into the body via osmosis in the small intestine, and the remainder will stay in the intestines to help with digestion.35 The water that does get absorbed will help facilitate transport of nutrients and other substances into the cells and bloodstream. Other essential functions of water include sweating, respiration, and serving as a shock absorber for the spinal cord and brain.36

Figure 3: Water and Human Body Function.36
expand this figure

At different ages, the human body contains different proportions (as a percentage of body weight) of water. Figure 3 above depicts the percentage of water found in several body tissues.36 Babies have the greatest percentage of water by weight, dropping to about 65% in one-year-olds and continuing to decrease over time, with adults having about 55% to 60% water by weight (women and men, respectively).1 The differences between adult men and women may be a result of men typically having leaner (muscle) tissue, which contains more water than adipose (fat) tissue.1

Many contaminants found in water and food, such as arsenic and lead, are metabolized and excreted through the urinary system. When a water-soluble chemical is ingested, or once a fat-soluble toxin has been converted into a water-soluble metabolite in the liver, it will be processed through the kidneys, also known as the body’s “liquid filter.” The kidneys will then direct the unknown substance to the urinary tract for excretion.

Elements of Water

The elements of water described below include microorganisms, disinfectants and their byproducts, inorganic, organic and petroleum-based contaminants, pesticides and herbicides, and taste properties of potable water.

As of 2017, some 85,000 chemicals have been included in the inventory laid out in the U.S. Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA), although not all are currently in commerce, with applications and uses ranging from flavoring and adding scents to plastics and flame retardation.37 This act, implemented in 1976, provides the EPA with authority to regulate toxic substances including, polycholorinated biphenyls (PCBs), asbestos, lead, mercury, formaldehyde and certain hexavalent chromium compounds.38 These chemicals can enter the water, air, and food supplies in a variety of ways, both intentionally and unintentionally. In addition, the water supply is vulnerable to biological contaminants such as bacteria, viruses, and protozoa. Biological contaminants can also be introduced into the water supply in a variety of ways from personal care products, industry, groundwater pollution, biological infestation, and other sources, while others come from the breakdown of disinfectants intentionally introduced through water treatment.39 Once in the water supply, sufficiently high concentrations of these pollutants may pose severe risks to human health in the form of microbial infections, cancer, and birth defects among others.39

Microorganisms Present in Water Supplies

According to CDC from 2009 – 2010, 33 drinking water-associated outbreaks were reported, resulting in 1,040 cases of illness, 85 hospitalizations, and nine deaths.40 In addition, based on the Global Infectious Disease and Epidemiology Network (GIDEON) database, areas across the world are at a higher risk of experiencing infectious disease epidemics due to water-associated outbreaks.41 While Brazil, northwest Africa, central Africa, and southwest China are at a higher risk for water-based diseases like schistosomiasis, areas in central Africa and North India have a higher risk of experiencing water-related diseases like malaria and dengue fever. In addition, western Europeans have an increased risk of encountering water-dispersed diseases.41

Disease-causing organisms, microorganisms or microbes are often referred to as pathogens. Waterborne diseases are caused by contact with or ingestion of pathogenic microorganisms. Pathogens may include various types of bacteria, protozoa, parasites, and other microscopic organisms.

1. Total Coliforms

Bacterial coliforms are a broad class of rod-shaped, non-sporulating bacteria that can come from multiple sources in the environment and fail to form new spores, which are reproductive cells.42 Their presence suggests that fecal pathogens, including the more-resistant non-coliform pathogens, might also be inhabiting the water source. Therefore, coliforms are often used as an indicator of contamination given that exposure to water containing coliforms could lead to a variety of adverse health outcomes.17 42

The EPA has set a MCLG of 0 mg/L for total coliforms, with an enforceable maximum contaminant level (MCL) allowing 5% of all samples within a single month to test positive for the presence of coliforms.17 The number of people a public water system serves determines the frequency of required testing.43 For example, in 2014 New York City had an estimated population of 8.5 million people and each month the city tested an average of 818 samples, totaling 9,818 for the year.44 Based on these figures, a total of 41 samples per month would be allowed to test positive for coliforms. (9,818 samples ÷ 12 months = 818 samples per month; 818 samples x 0.05 = 41 samples allowed to contain coliforms). As is the case in many large cities, one to two percent of samples test positive for coliforms during the peak months, but anything beyond the 5% threshold would be considered a public health hazard and would trigger mandatory remediation.44

Escherichia coli (E. coli) is a well-known coliform that is included in total coliform measurements but is often tested for separately.45 Most E. coli live in the human gut where they produce vitamin K and defend the body against disease-causing bacteria. However, some strains, such as O157:H7, excrete toxic chemicals that can be life-threatening.46 E. coli is transmitted in a number of ways including contaminated food and water and cross-contamination from fecal matter.47 According to CDC data from a 2012 report, in the U.S., E. coli (STEC) infections result in more than 3,600 hospitalizations and 30 deaths annually, with most cases being attributed to STEC O157:H7. 48 Exposure to E. coli can cause illness and generally affects the digestive system but can also impact the blood stream.49

The EPA MCLG for E. coli is 0 mg/L, but the contaminant limit allows for occasional positive readings that may result from faulty measurements.19 For E. coli, any individual sampling station may not test positive for bacteria twice in a row if one of those samples contains E. coli. If violations occur, municipalities must make public warning announcements and take action as directed by the EPA.19

The EPA notes that anyone can become infected with E. coli O157:H7, but those at greatest risk of developing a serious illness from exposure are the elderly and children under the age of five.50

Health Effects

Digestive System

Diarrhea, vomiting, nausea, and cramps. E. coli in drinking water is known to cause gastrointestinal disorders such as diarrhea, vomiting, nausea, and cramps.17 50

Solutions

1. Filtration and Reverse Osmosis

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) report that filtration methods (such as microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF), and nanofiltration (NF), and reverse osmosis (RO) can help to reduce and remove bacteria such as E. coli from water.51 The CDC reports that MF is moderately effective for removing bacteria such as E. coli, while UF, NF, and RO are extremely effective when it comes to removing bacteria such as E. coli.51

2. Chlorination

The EPA states that use of chlorine treatment as a disinfectant will effectively kill or inactivate E. coli.52

3. Ozonation

The EPA states that the use of ozone to disinfect drinking water has proven to be effective for the inactivation of E. coli (not including E. coli O157:H7).53

4. Ultra-Violet Sanitation

The EPA states that disinfecting water with ultra-violet light is effective in removing or inactivating E. coli (not including E. coli O157:H7).54

2. Protozoa and Helminths

The WHO cites protozoa and helminthes (parasitic worms) among the most common causes of infection and disease in humans and animals, and are associated with a significant portion of the global disease burden.55 Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium are single-celled microbes often found in water systems contaminated by sewage.56 57 Much larger than bacteria, these protozoa can cause digestive problems, especially in vulnerable populations, such as young children and the elderly.57 According to the EPA, the PHG for both Giardia and Cryptosporidium is 0 mg/L.19

The protozoa Giardia lamblia is reported to be North America’s most common intestinal parasite, causing gastrointestinal illness known as giardiasis, a diarrheal disease.58 Water (both drinking water and recreational water) is the most common route of transmission for Giardia.56 Giardia can also be transmitted from person to person, happening most frequently among children.59

Cryptosporidium is a common protozoa that is widespread in water sources such as rivers, lakes, and streams and can persist for months in these environments.57 60 This protozoan infects the lining of the intestines causing a disease known as cryptosporidiosis. Symptoms associated with cryptosporidiosis range from a mild upset stomach to severe diarrhea, a problem that can be life-threatening in vulnerable populations.61 Multiple waterborne disease outbreaks caused by Cryptosporidium have occurred around the world over the past several decades.61 62 In 1993, a contamination of Cryptosporidium in Milwaukee, Wisconsin’s municipal water supply caused more than 400,000 people to become ill, costing an estimated $96.2 million (USD).63 More recently, in 2010, approximately 27,000 residents of Östersund, Sweden were infected by cryptosporidiosis, causing individuals with chronic intestinal disease as well as young residents to face severe and long-lasting diarrhea.64 The WHO notes that Cryptosporidium outbreaks can have very high impacts due to the large number of people that may be infected. Those most at risk are people who are severely immunocompromised.65

Cyclospora cayetanensis is a waterborne pathogen that has been associated with several waterborne outbreaks worldwide. Of particular concern was a 2013 outbreak where 631 cases were identified across 25 U.S. states.66 The symptoms associated with exposure include acute gastrointestinal discomfort. Symptoms arise from visiting regions where the pathogen is endemic, and is colloquially known as “traveler’s diarrhea,” with the highest risk regions including parts of Asia, the Middle East, Africa, Mexico, and Central and South America.67

Health Effects

Digestive System

Diarrhea, nausea, abdominal cramps, and vomiting. The CDC states that infection from Cyclospora cayetanensis can result in gastrointestinal effects including diarrhea, nausea, abdominal cramps, and vomiting.68

Giardiasis. The CDC reports that ingestion of water containing Giardia lamblia can cause giardiasis, a gastrointestinal disorder with symptoms including cramps, diarrhea, vomiting, and fatigue.69

Cryptosporidiosis. Cryptosporidium infections due to ingestion of contaminated water are short-term and include symptoms such as diarrhea, vomiting, and nausea. The severity of the symptoms varies according to age and immune status.70 71

Nervous System

Keratitis. According to the CDC, infection by the protozoa Acanthamoeba (a parasite frequently found in fresh and salt water, as well as brackish water, defined as a slightly salty mix of river and sea water) via contact with contaminated water can cause amoebic keratitis, characterized by eye pain, redness, blurred vision, sensitivity to light, and excessive tearing.72 In addition, if not treated properly, Acanthamoeba keratitis can even lead to vision loss.73

Granulomatous amebic encephalitis (GAE). The CDC reports that infection by Acanthamoeba can lead to granulomatous amebic encephalitis, an infection of the brain and spinal cord. While rare, GAE primarily affects people with compromised immune systems and can be fatal.72

Solutions

1. Ultra-Violet Sanitation

According to the EPA, using ultra-violet light to disinfect watereffectively removes or inactivates Cryptosporidium and Giardia lamblia.74

2. Ozonation

The EPA notes that while chlorination alone will not successfully eliminate Cryptosporidium from the water, a combination of ozone and chlorine disinfection is effective for removal or inactivation of Cryptosporidium.53

3. Filtration and Reverse Osmosis

According to the EPA, filtration has demonstrated its effectiveness in removing both Cryptosporidium and Giardia lamblia.75 NSF/ANSI Standard 53 filters are certified and tested to remove both Cryptosporidium and Giardia lamblia; common filters with this certification are carbon, MF, UF, and NF.76 The CDC reports that MF, UF, NF, and RO are all highly effective for the removal of Cryptosporidium and Giardia.51

3. Cyanobacteria

Cyanobacteria is commonly identified by its color. Known as blue-green algae, cyanobacteria are naturally occurring photosynthetic aquatic life forms.

Fertilizer runoff of nitrogen and phosphorous can cause rapid cyanobacteria population growth, also known as “blooms,” which deplete oxygen from the water and kill other forms of life.

Figure 4 below shows an aerial view of a bloom of cyanobacteria caused by fertilizer and sewage runoff in Lake Atitlán, northern Guatemala.77

Figure 4: NASA Satellite image of A “bloom” of cyanobacteria caused by fertilizer and sewage runoff.77
expand this figure

Some species of cyanobacteria produce toxins that can be hazardous to humans. Microcystins and cylindrospermopsin are some of the most common toxins produced by cyanobacteria found in drinking and swimming water.55 People can be exposed to these toxins via ingestion and also through contact with contaminated water while outdoors or showering.55 Canadian Drinking Water Quality Standards set the maximum acceptable concentration (MAC) for cyanobacterial toxins at 0.0015 mg/L.78 The U.S. has not yet established a drinking water guideline level for microcystins.79

Health Effects

Digestive System

Abdominal pain, vomiting, and diarrhea. The WHO notes that, while primarily affecting the liver, cyanotoxins may cause acute gastrointestinal issues including abdominal pain, vomiting, and diarrhea.80 81

Liver inflammation. The National Plan for Algal Toxins and Harmful Algal Blooms as well as the U.S. EPA note that common health effects from drinking water and swimming in water contaminated with microcystins and cylindrospermopsin include liver inflammation and hemorrhage, and potential tumor growth promotion in the liver of laboratory animals.82 83

Digestive and Endocrine Systems

Liver tumors and cancer. The National Plan for Algal Toxins and Harmful Algal Blooms and the WHO state that long-term health effects from exposure to cyanobacteria include potential tumor growth promotion in the liver, hepatocellular carcinoma, and liver failure leading to death in laboratory animals.55 82

Nervous System

Neural Effects. The U.S. EPA and Harmful Algal Research and Response National Environmental Science Strategy (HARRNESS) note that the anatoxin-a group of cyanotoxins affect the nervous system, causing effects such as “tingling, burning, numbness, drowsiness, incoherent speech, salivation and respiratory paralysis leading to death”.82 83

Respiratory System

Acute pneumonia. Exposure to microcystins and cylindrospermopsin via drinking water or bodies of water can lead to acute pneumonia.55 82

Solutions

1. Ozonation

The EPA notes that ozone is a very effective treatment process for oxidizing extracellular microcystin, anatoxin-a and cylindrospermopsin.83

Read More

2. Chlorination

The EPA notes that chlorination is an effective treatment process for oxidizing extracellular cyanotoxins when the pH is below 8. That said, chlorination is not as effective for the removal of anatoxin-a and is not recommended for removal of intracellular cyanotoxins.83

3. Filtration

The EPA notes that both powdered activated carbon (PAC) and granular activated carbon (GAC) are shown to be effective in absorbing microcystin and cylindrospermopsin, although variants of microcystin may have different absorption efficiencies.83 Additionally, the performance of the activated carbon for removing cyanobacteria is influenced by the amount of activated carbon and the dose of the bacteria.

The EPA also notes that NF and RO are effective in removing microcystin and cylinderospermopsin. The EPA recommends completing site-specific tests because efficiency varies by membrane pore-size distribution and water quality.83

4. Legionella

Legionella is a species of bacteria naturally present in many bodies of water and is not considered a major threat when ingested. However, if inhaled, it can lead to legionellosis (commonly called Legionnaires’ Disease), a type of pneumonia. This occurs most often when inappropriately treated and managed water is used in hot tubs, showers, fountains, and large building refrigeration system and forms a mist of contaminated water. The Legionella bacteria was first identified in 1976 following an outbreak in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania and each year in the U.S. results in roughly 8,000 to 18,000 hospitalizations.84 85

Health Effects

Respiratory System

Legionellosis. As a type of pneumonia, legionellosis is an infection of the lungs. It can cause coughs and shortness of breath, and also muscle- and headaches. If untreated, it can lead to lung failure and death.84

Solutions

1. Chlorination

Legionella thrives in warm water, like that used in hot tubs and spas. Chlorinating water at 2-4 mg/L can prevent its growth in this environment; however, the elevated water temperatures also make chlorine levels fall more rapidly than water at ambient temperatures, so extra care must be taken to maintain these levels.85

2. Building Management

Preventing Legionella growth in a large building with a complex water system requires a coordinated effort by many team members. In an effort to codify these strategies, ASHRAE has published a Standard 188: Legionella: Risk Management for Building Water Systems, a consensus-driven document authored by technically qualified committee members. It describes steps including forming a team for Legionella management, inventorying the components of the building’s water systems, analyzing potential hazards, identifying critical control points, establishing performance limits and corrective actions, and documenting procedures.86

Disinfectants

To protect consumers from potential pathogens in drinking water, primary treatment often involves adding a disinfecting agent. Common additives include disinfectant products such as chlorine and chloramine, which provide a residual degree of disinfection so that the water does not become recontaminated as it flows from the treatment facility to the point of use.

1. Chlorine

Chlorine is the most common antimicrobial additive used in U.S. water supply.87

In municipal systems, chlorine is added in gaseous or liquid form (as sodium hypochlorite) to control microbial growth.87 A strong oxidizer, chlorine kills bacteria by attacking the phospholipid bilayer that forms a cell’s outer membrane and by denaturing cellular enzymes.88 It has the lowest production and operating costs of all disinfectants and “the longest history for large continuous disinfection operations”.89 However, chlorine in water can combine with organic matter to form compounds called disinfectant byproducts (DBPs) such as trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAs), which are typically present at the tens of µg/L concentration.90 THMs are used as indicators of other unregulated DBPs. The Maximum Residual Disinfectant Level (MRDL) for chlorine is 4 mg/L.89

Health Effects

Respiratory System

Nose stinging or irritation. The EPA notes that chronic exposure to chlorine in drinking and swimming water at levels greater than the maximum residual disinfectant level may result in stinging or irritation to the nose.89 91

Digestive System

Stomach discomfort. The EPA cites stomach discomfort as an effect of drinking water containing chlorine in excess of the specified MRDL.92

Rectal and colon cancer. The EPA notes that while the agency cannot conclude that there is a causal link, studies have suggested an association, albeit small, between exposure to chlorinated surface water and rectal and colon cancer.93 More research is required to evaluate the strength of this association.

Nervous System

Eye stinging or irritation. According to the EPA, exposure to chlorine in drinking water at levels in excess of the MRDL can lead to eye stinging or irritation.89 That said, a much more common source of ocular irritation takes place when exposed to chloramines frequently found in pools thanks to chlorine mixing with impurities from swimmers.94

Solutions

1. Filtration

A research group out of Nebraska has found that activated carbon filters are an effective treatment method for removing chlorine from drinking water at the household point of use.95 However, the performance of the activated carbon filters will depend on the concentration of the chlorine in the drinking water and also on the amount of available carbon.96

Additionally, filters with NSF/ANSI 42 certification with claims for removing or reducing free chlorine (excess chlorine that is not bound to any contaminant) are effective in reducing overall chlorine consumption. These filters have been tested and meet the performance metrics set forth by the NSF International for removing excess chlorine from water.97

2. Chloramines

Chloramine is a disinfectant that is commonly used as a secondary disinfectant in public water systems. Chloramine (monochloramine) provides longer-lasting water treatment while water is piped through distribution systems to consumers.98 The use of chloramine originated, in part, to reduce the formation of potentially harmful disinfectant byproducts. Chloramine has been effective in controlling the formation of trihalomethanes (THMs) and haloacetic acids (HAAS) and may be more efficacious than chlorine against Legionella, the pathogen responsible for Legionnaire’s Disease.98 However, chloramine fails to kill chlorine-resistant pathogens such as Cryptosporidium but may be more efficacious than chlorine against Legionella, the pathogen responsible for Legionnaire’s Disease.98

The WHO notes that chloramine can be used as an alternative to free chlorine in water distribution systems that have both longer residence times and higher temperatures.55 Under these conditions, the risk of nitrite formation from biofilms should be considered, especially in areas with the presence of excess ammonia.55

There are three primary types of chloramines: mono-, di- and trichloramine. The EPA sets a MRDL for chloramines at 4 mg/L,88 while Canada’s maximum acceptable concentration is 3 mg/L.99 The EPA has also established a lifetime health advisory of 3 mg/L (for a 70-kg adult consuming 2 L of water per day), which is the concentration at which a lifetime of exposure will not result in adverse non-carcinogenic effects, such as organ damage, reproductive difficulty, or nervous system impairment.88

Health Effects

Cardiovascular System

Anemia. The EPA reports that drinking water with levels of chloramine in excess of the 4 mg/L MDLG may cause anemia, a reduction in the oxygen-carrying capacity of red blood cells.92

Digestive System

Stomach discomfort. The EPA cites stomach discomfort as an effect of drinking water containing chloramine in excess of the maximum residual disinfectant level.92

Nervous System

Eye stinging or irritation. According to the EPA, stinging and/or irritation of the eyes is a health effect associated with exposure to chloramines in excess of the maximum residual disinfectant level in drinking and swimming water.92

Integumentary System

Nose stinging or irritation. According to the EPA, stinging and/or irritation of the nose is a health effect associated with exposure to chloramines in excess of the maximum residual disinfectant level in drinking and swimming water.92

Solutions

1. Filtration

Activated carbon filters may be used to remove chloramines from drinking water.95 100 The Scottish Centre for Infection and Environmental Health states that activated carbon with low flow rates (contact time of 5-10 minutes) followed by residual ammonia adsorption using mineral zeolite media can successfully remove chloramines.100 Ammonia removal can help to reduce further chloramine formation and nitrification. Performance of the activated carbon filter will depend on the concentration of the chloramine in the drinking water and on the amount of available carbon.

Disinfectant Byproducts (DBPs)

Disinfectants, such as chlorine and chloramine, are often added to protect drinking water from pathogenic microorganisms. However, when chlorine and chloramine are added to water, they sometimes react with other organic matter to produce trihalomethanes (THMs), haloacetic acids and other chemicals collectively known as disinfectant byproducts (DBPs).

In some cases, these byproducts have been shown to result in cancer and other adverse health effects in laboratory animals and humans.55 101 102 103 The effects of low dose exposure to DBPs are not fully known, and warrant further study.104 105

The EPA regulates four trihalomethanes (THMs) that are closely related in chemical structure: chloroform, dibromochloromethane, bromoform, and bromodichloromethane.88 Combined, a maximum allowable amount of 80 µg/L is acceptable in drinking water. In addition, five haloacetic acids known collectively as HAA5 are monitored. These five acids – monochloroacetic acid, dichloroacetic acid, trichloroacetic acid, monobromoacetic acid and dibromoacetic acid – must in combination exist at levels less than 60 µg/L in drinking water.88 It is up to the individual municipalities (like state or local governments) to impose additional limits on particular components of the THMs and HAA5 if warranted. Since these chemicals are produced by an organo-chlorine reaction, the limits pose a constraint on either the amount of chlorination used in a water system or the levels of organic matter in water subject to chlorination. Water systems that use chloramine usually produce water with lower levels of regulated DBPs, such as trihalomethanes or haloacetic acids, but can contain iodoacids, which are not currently regulated but have been shown to be highly toxic to rodents.106 Other research indicates that iodoacids are some of the most toxic byproducts of water disinfection in chloramine systems.107 108

The concentration of disinfectant byproducts varies based on conditions such as local rainfall and storm events, such as as flooding which may cause large deposits of organic material to wash into waterways. Thus, municipalities are increasingly relying on ozone and ultraviolet germicidal irradation (UVGI) as alternative treatment methods to reduce the dependence on chlorine, and prevent the formation of DBPs.109 In addition, many water systems are controlling the formation of disinfection byproducts by lowering levels of organic matter in water prior to disinfection.

1. Haloacetic Acids (HHAs)

Haloacetic acids are a type of DBP.88 The five HAAs regulated by the EPA (HAA5) are chloroacetic acid, dichloracetic acid, trichloracetic acid, bromoacetic acid, and dibromoacetic acid.

Dichloroacetic acid (DCA) is classified as a Group 2B carcinogen, probable human carcinogen, by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC).110 The IARC and ToxNet note that there is insufficient human evidence to classify dichloroacetic acid as a human carcinogen.110 111

The Environmental Working Group (EWG) reports that from 2004-2009, 2,411 water utility systems serving a total of more than 33 million people had HAA concentrations greater than the EPA’s MCL of 60 µg/L.112

The WHO reports monochloroacetic acid concentrations in surface water-derived drinking water may be upwards of 82 µg/L, with a mean of 2.1 µg/L in public water systems.55 Dichloroacetic acid has been reported in ground and surface water systems to have a mean concentration of 20 µg/L in municipal systems. Trichloroacetic acid detected in distribution systems in the U.S. has been found to have a mean concentration of 5.3 µg/L, with maximums as high as 174 µg/L. Lastly, brominated acetic acids are present in surface and groundwater systems with mean concentrations below 5 µg/L.55

Health Effects

Reproductive System

Reproductive System Injury. The Oregon Department of Public Health informs consumers that the HAA5 levels encountered in drinking water are not expected to produce any acute health effects.113 They do note, however, that exposure over long periods of time to the maximum contaminant level (0.06 mg/L) or greater levels may lead to injury of the reproductive system. In animal studies, HAA exposure has been linked to spontaneous abortion and decreased fertility.113

Low birth weight and intrauterine growth retardation. Epidemiological studies indicate potential adverse health effects from haloacetic acid exposure in drinking water during the second and third trimesters of pregnancy.114 Evidence suggests that exposure to these chemicals during pregnancy may lead to low birth weight and intrauterine growth retardation.114 115 116

Urinary and Endocrine Systems

Hepatocellular carcinomas and adenomas. According to the EPA, exposure to dichloroacetic acid via drinking water has been associated with hepatocellular carcinomas and adenomas in lab rodents.117 118

Solutions

1. Filtration

The U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation recommends the use of reverse osmosis for the effective removal of HAAs.119 This treatment technology also works to remove natural organic material (NOM) and helps to reduce future HAA5 formation.119

In addition, the U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation recommends the use of activated carbon filters for effective HAA5 adsorption and removal.119

2. Trihalomethanes (THMs)

Exposure to chloroform and other trihalomethanes can occur through drinking and bathing water and through and swimming in chlorinated water bodies.120

The EPA’s MCL for trihalomethanes is 80 µg/L.17

Health Effects

Urinary System

Renal tubular necrosis and renal dysfunction. The WHO states that a universally observed toxic effect of exposure to the THMs chloroform is kidney damage, and more specific effects include renal tubular necrosis and renal dysfunction.90

Urinary tract birth defects. A cohort study analyzing the relationship between chlorination levels and birth defects found an increase in urinary tract birth defects in municipalities where water was treated with chlorine and had high color, which indicates high levels of organic compounds.121 With an odds ratio of 1.99, this study suggests a significant association between chlorination and urinary tract birth defects.121

Digestive System

Liver cysts. Canada’s Health Deparatment, Health Canada, identifies fatty cysts in the liver as a possible health effect from exposure to trihalomethanes.78

Urinary and Endocrine Systems

Bladder cancer. In a case-control study with 2,490 subjects in Spain, researchers found an association between estimated DBP exposure (via THM concentration) from ingestion of drinking water, dermal absorption and inhalation while showering, bathing and swimming and an increased risk of bladder cancer.122 Researchers noted that the risk of bladder cancer doubled (OR 2.10) with exposure levels greater than 49 µg/L, which the authors note is a common level in industrialized societies.122 In addition, a meta-analysis pooling data from three case-control studies conducted in France, Finland, and Spain, found a significant increase in bladder cancer risk among men exposed to THM levels greater than 25 µg/L during their lifetime.123

Reproductive System

Spontaneous abortion. A multivariate analysis out of California, analyzing the relationship between drinking tap water versus bottled water while pregnant, indicates a relationship between drinking cold tap water while pregnant and spontaneous abortion.124 With an odds ratio of 2.17 women who reported drinking high levels of cold tap water had much higher chance of experiencing a spontaneous abortion than those women who consumed no cold tap water while pregnant.124 In addition, a prospective study found that women who consumed 5 or more glasses of water of cold tapwater containing 75 µg/L THMs per day demonstrated a higher risk (OR 1.8, 95% CI 1.1 to 3.0) of spontaneous abortion,125

Low birthweight. Research has shown a link between consuming water with chloroform or disinfectant byproducts, such as trihalomethanes, during pregnancy and low birth weight.126 The concentrations investigated ranged from 20 to 100 µg/L – levels commonly found in many large water systems.126

Solutions

1. Filtration

The EPA and the U.S. Department of the Interior noted that THMs can be removed by adsorption with activated carbon filters.127 128

Inorganic Contaminants

Trace elements of inorganic contaminants are common in water and are not necessarily harmful to health. In fact, many minerals such as calcium, magnesium, potassium, and sodium are essential for a healthy body, while metals such as zinc, copper, iron, manganese, selenium, and zinc are required at low levels.129 That said, at high levels, even these essential metals can be harmful to health. Airborne exposure to certain metals such as arsenic, barium, cadmium, chromium, lead, mercury, and selenium have been associated with negative health effects including cancer, damage to the nervous system, kidney and liver complications, and even learning and behavioral problems in children.130 131

Metals in surface water systems can originate from natural or anthropogenic sources. Many of the anthropogenic sources include run-off from industrial and agricultural processes, along with mining and other human activities. Additionally, certain inorganic materials such as fluoride, manganese, and zinc may purposely be added to water to improve taste and aesthetic qualities.

1. Arsenic

Arsenic is an element found in the earth’s crust and is relatively abundant in some locations. The IARC classifies inorganic arsenic compounds as Group 1 carcinogens, noting that there is sufficient evidence linking arsenic with cancer in humans.110 The EPA enforces an MCL of 0.01 mg/L for arsenic.132

In 2000, the National Resource Defense Council (NRDC) estimated that 34 million Americans in the 25 states analyzed lived in areas where water contained arsenic at levels over 0.5 µg/L.133

The NRDC believes these high levels result in a greater than 1 in 10,000 chance of developing bladder, kidney, and liver cancer.133

Most districts serving more than a half million people keep arsenic concentrations in water at 0.1 to 2.0 µg/L. High arsenic levels are mainly found in small water systems and wells, although water systems found in greater Albuquerque, portions of Los Angeles, and some cities in Texas and Oklahoma also have high arsenic concentrations.133 134 135

There are two types of arsenic primarily found in water – trivalent (AsO3) and pentavalent (AsO5).136 Both types are inorganic and typically come from organically occurring arsenic in the earth. Trivalent arsenic is more difficult to remove, generally because it is less charged than the pentavalent molecule, making it more difficult to remove via conventional means such as reverse osmosis.136

Health Effects

Integumentary System

Skin damage. The EPA states that concentrations of arsenic in water above the EPA’s acceptable level of 10 ppb can cause skin discoloration, thickening of the skin, and skin damage.17

Integumentary and Endocrine Systems

Skin cancer. The WHO and the EPA indicate that skin cancer is one possible result of chronic arsenic exposure.137 138 139

Cardiovascular System

Anemia. According to the National Academy of Sciences, acute and chronic arsenic poisoning may result in anemia.140

Immune System

Leukopenia and thrombocytopenia. According to research published by the National Academy of Sciences, acute and chronic arsenic poisoning may result in leukopenia and thrombocytopenia (low platelet count).140

Immunosuppression. A review by Dangleben et al. states that chronic exposure to arsenic can lead to immunosuppression.141

Urinary and Endocrine Systems

Bladder and kidney cancer. The World Health Organizations concludes that long-term exposure to arsenic increases the risk of developing cancer in the bladder and kidney.142 The EPA reports that long-term or chronic exposure to arsenic at levels greater than the maximum contaminant level (10 µg/L) has been linked to increases in cancer of the kidney, liver, and bladder.138 139

Respiratory and Endocrine Systems

Lung cancer. The WHO and EPA both report that chronic exposure to arsenic in drinking water at levels exceeding the maximum contaminant level has been linked to lung cancer.55 138 139

Digestive System

Inflammation of the stomach and intestine. The Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (ATSDR) reports that arsenic exposure may result in inflammation of the stomach and intestine.143

Hepatic necrosis. The ATSDR reports that hepatic necrosis may occur from exposure to arsenic.143

Cardiovascular System

Peripheral vascular disease. The EPA notes that chronic exposure to arsenic may lead to circulatory problems.17 The National Academy of Sciences notes that peripheral vascular disease, one of the most common cardiovascular effects, develops from chronic inorganic arsenic exposure, notably from drinking water sources and arsenic-contaminated wine or wine substitutes.140

Peripheral vascular disease is the hardening of the arteries that supply blood to hands, legs, and feet. If left untreated or not treated properly it may lead to nerve and tissue damage.144

Nervous System

Neurological effects. The arsenic review completed by the National Academy of Sciences notes that neurological effects from chronic arsenic exposure can range from mild nuisances such as headaches and confusion to extreme effects such as paralysis, florid encephalopathy, seizures and coma.140 However, the correlation between chronic arsenic exposure and extreme neurological effects is not strong.145

Solutions

1. Filtration

The Ohio Department of Health notes that reverse osmosis is a popular method for arsenic removal, enabling the elimination of up to 60 to 90% of the arsenic in the water depending on the arsenic’s valence.146 Trivalent arsenic tends to be more challenging to remove from water than pentavalent arsenic. With the use of effective antioxidants, such as free chlorine, trivalent arsenic can be converted to pentavalent arsenic.146 Thus, arsenic in water with residual free chlorine, or arsenic that has been treated by other effective oxidizers, exists primarily as pentavalent arsenic.

As per the recommendations of the Ohio Department of Health, if the valence of the arsenic is unknown, RO may still be effective but should be used with caution when treating drinking water with concentrations of arsenic in excess of 70 µg/L.146 Since treatment of water for trivalent arsenic is estimated to provide 60% removal, this method is capable of reducing filtered water to the EPA MCL of 10 µg/L for arsenic.146

The University of Nebraska identifies iron- or manganese-doped adsorbent media as an effective treatment technology for removing or reducing arsenic levels in drinking water.95 The doped adsorbent media will act much like an activated carbon filter and remove the arsenic as it flows through the filter.95

2. Distillation

The University of Nebraska notes that distillation is an effective treatment process for arsenic removal.95

2. Copper

Copper is a metallic element that can naturally enter water sources, but drinking water contamination most commonly occurs through the corrosion of copper or brass household plumbing fixtures.147 Water that is acidic and lacks orthophosphates (which is the case after RO treatment) tends to be especially corrosive. Sampling procedures for copper levels must come from customer piping rather than source water or water company piping. The maximum dissolved copper level allowed by the EPA is 1.3 mg/L before a treatment technique must be used.147 Canadian drinking water guidelines limit copper to one mg/L, which is an aesthetic objective (AO).148 The state of California currently has a PHG of limiting copper levels to 0.3 mg/L in drinking water.149

The EWG reports that in 2004, 4,100 water utility systems in the U.S., which together serve more than 23 million people, reported copper concentrations above the health-based limits with the highest concentration reported reaching 7000 µg/L.150

Health Effects

Digestive System

Nausea, abdominal pain, and vomiting. In a study of 60 women, researchers reported an association between short-term consumption of drinking water with aggregate copper content at ≥3 mg/l and increased incidence of nausea, abdominal pain, and vomiting.151 In addition, a randomized, double-blind community intervention trial in Santiago, Chile found that nausea serves as a strong indicator of an early response to acute copper exposure.152

Liver damage. The EPA notes that liver damage may result from exposure to copper in drinking water.147

Solutions

1. Filtration

The Ohio Department of Health and the University of Nebraska indicate that reverse osmosis removes or reduces copper from water.95 146 In addition, the Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources at the University of Nebraska states that activated carbon filters equipped with special copper-specific media are effective for copper reduction and removal.95

2. Distillation

The University of Nebraska Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources indicates that distillation is an effective treatment technology for copper reduction and removal.95

3. Corrosion Control

The EPA’s lead and copper rule requires water distribution systems to reduce lead and copper levels in tapwater by improving corrosion control within service lines and piping.153

Lead is one of the most notorious waterborne pollutants, with most lead contamination entering the water system post-treatment, absorbed from pipes of an individual home.154

3. Lead

It is estimated that 10 to 20% of human exposure to lead comes from drinking water.154 Lead contamination can occur through the erosion of natural deposits, but the most common sources are lead piping and water mains in older buildings.154 Hot or acidic water is more likely to corrode lead pipes, leading to contamination. Lead sampling, like copper sampling, must come from customer piping rather than source water or municipal piping. The maximum lead level allowed by the EPA before requiring treatment is 0.015 mg/L.154 The European Union restricts lead in drinking water to below 0.01 mg/L.155

Health Effects

Nervous System

Developmental delays. Lead exposure can result in physical or mental developmental delays. The EPA reports that children exposed to lead can display deficits in attention span and learning abilities.17 According to a report issued by the EPA, lead stored in bones can be released during pregnancy, which can affect fetal brain development, making children particularly susceptible to lead poisoning.156

Cardiovascular System

High blood pressure. The EPA reports that lead can contribute to high blood pressure in adults and also interfere with the production of red blood cells.157

Red blood cell production. The EPA reports that chronic exposure to lead in drinking water at levels greater than the MCL can interfere with the production of red blood cells that transport oxygen throughout the body.156

Urinary System

Kidney problems. The EPA reports that exposure to lead in drinking water can result in kidney problems, and that adults with kidney problems are susceptible to adverse health effects from even low levels of lead.17 156 157

Solutions

1. Filtration

The Ohio Department of Health reports that reverse osmosis is an effective method for removing and reducing lead concentrations in water.146 In addition, activated carbon filtration equipped with special lead media is also a treatment option for lead reduction and removal according to the Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources at the University of Nebraska.95

2. Distillation

The University of Nebraska reports that distillation is an effective treatment technology for lead reduction and removal.95

3. Corrosion Control

The EPA’s lead and copper rule requires water distribution systems to reduce lead and copper levels at the tap by improving corrosion control within service lines and piping.153

4. Fluoride

Sodium fluoride, commonly referred to simply as fluoride, is often added to municipal water systems to prevent tooth decay.158 This practice known as fluoridation has played a leading role in strengthening teeth and preventing cavities for communities across the U.S.159 In some areas, natural fluoride deposits can dissolve into the water. Most toothpaste contains approximately 1,000 mg/L fluoride and it is not intended to be ingested.160 Water systems typically have fluoride levels of 0.7 to 1 mg/L.160

Adults absorb 60% of the fluoride they ingest, of which 99% eventually becomes incorporated into teeth and bones.161 The EPA has an enforceable MCL of 4 mg/L and suggests a non-enforceable secondary drinking water guideline of 2 mg/L.88 The WHO has one of the lowest guidelines values for fluoride at 1.5 mg/L.55

Health Effects

Skeletal System

Fluorosis. Fluorosis, an aesthetic mottling of the teeth, can occur due to fluoride exposure.162 Aside from possible discoloration, fluoride exposure has limited negative health effects. Fluorosis is most common among young people. The CDC reports that from 1999-2004 the prevalence of fluorosis among adolescents aged 12 to 15 was 41% while prevalence among adults aged 40 to 49 was 9%.162

According to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, fluorosis has been known to occur in populations with drinking water that contains 25-40 mg/L fluoride.160

Pain and tenderness of the bones. According to the Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, weakening of bones has been known to occur in populations where drinking water contains fluoride levels of 25-40 mg/L.160 The EPA reports that it is possible for some people who drink water with excess fluoride over many years to develop bone disease.163

Solutions

1. Filtration

The Ohio Department of Health and the EPA recommend reverse osmosis as an effective method for the removal and reduction of fluoride to levels below the MCL. 146 163 164

2. Distillation

The EPA notes that distillation is effective for removing fluoride up to levels below 4.0 mg/L.163

5. Nitrates

Nitrates are compounds consisting of nitrogen and oxygen that are used in fertilizers, the runoff of which can reach rivers. The EPA sets an MCL for nitrates in drinking water at 10 mg/L.17

Health Effects

Cardiovascular System

Methaemoglobinemia. Methaemoglobinemia, otherwise known as “blue baby syndrome,” is a result of the blood’s decreased ability to carry oxygen throughout the body.55 According to the WHO, one of the most common causes of methaemoglobinemia is nitrate exposure in drinking water.55 Symptoms include blueness near the mouth, hands, and feet. Water with more than 20 mg/L of nitrates (twice greater than the EPA limit) can be dangerous to infants, who might experience oxygen deprivation as a result of the nitrates transforming and disabling hemoglobin. Depending on the severity, the condition can quickly become lethal. Due to the high concentrations required for this effect, nitrate poisoning usually occurs in homes supplied by well water.165 The WHO reports that keeping nitrate levels in drinking water sources below 50 mg/L is an effective preventative measure to limit adverse health effects associated with nitrates.55

Endocrine System

Thyroid hypertrophy. One study reports that high levels of nitrates in drinking water (>50 mg/L) have been correlated with hypertrophy of the thyroid in adults.166

Solutions

1. Filtration

The EPA recommends reverse osmosis as an effective treatment process for nitrate removal to levels below 10 mg/l.167

6. Antimony

Antimony is a naturally occurring metal found in ore deposits. The most common form of antimony is antimony trioxide, which is used as a flame retardant.168 Other uses for antimony include batteries, pigments, and ceramics/glass manufacturing. The EPA notes that high amounts of antimony released into land and water are associated with petroleum refinery industries, fire retardants, ceramins, electronics, and solder.168 The Government of New Brunswick states that additional sources of antimony include fertilizer runoff, fossil fuel combustion products, and landfill leaching.169 One report from the Institute of Environmental Geochemistry at the University of Heidelberg provides data indicating that antimony levels in bottled water can increase over time in storage due to antimony leaching from polyethylene terephthalate (PET(E)) bottles.170 The data indicates a 90% increase in antimony concentrations in European bottled water after six months of storage.170 Meanwhile, a study conducted in Arizona found that higher temperatures accelerated the release of antimony into the water, indicating that water bottles left in temperatures above 65 degrees Celsius could experience antimony leaching.171

The WHO notes that the most common source of antimony in water is from the dissolution of metal plumbing and fittings.172 A report from the ATSDR indicates that the concentration of antimony dissolved in rivers and lakes is very low, usually less than 5 ppb, with a high of 8 ppb being reported in a river polluted with antimony mining waste. In addition, soil concentrations are usually less than 1 mg/L.173 The EPA and Canada both regulate antimony concentrations in drinking water to 0.006 mg/L.88 148

Health Effects

Cardiovascular System

Increased blood cholesterol. The EPA notes that chronic exposure to antimony levels greater than the MCL of 6 µg/L in drinking water may result in increases in blood cholesterol.17

Decreased blood sugar. The EPA notes that chronic exposure to antimony levels greater than the MCL of 6 µg/L in drinking water may result in drops in blood sugar.17

Heart complications. A study reports that chronic exposure to antimony compounds in rats has been associated with myocardial effects and heart complications.174 Additionally, the ATSDR states that breathing 2 mg/m³ can result in heart problems as displayed by altered electrocardiograms.175

Digestive System

Vomiting, nausea, and diarrhea. The Government of New Brunswick reports that short-term exposure over the course of days or weeks to very high antimony concentrations (> 30 mg/L) can result in vomiting, nausea and diarrhea.169 In addition, based on findings from a range of studies, the ATSDR lists vomiting and stomach ulcers as a potential result of overexposure to antimony.176

Solutions

1. Filtration

The Government of New Brunswick states that while there are no devices designed specifically for antimony reduction; effective advanced filtration methods for reducing antimony levels in drinking water include filtration, coagulation, and reverse osmosis.169

2. Distillation

The Government of New Brunswick states that while there are no devices designed specifically for antimony reduction; however, effective methods for reducing antimony levels in drinking water include distillation.169

7. Nickel

From the sedimentation of fine particles in the atmosphere and decomposition of rocks and soil to biological decays and the disposal of waste, there are many different ways nickel enters ground and surface water as a pollutant.177 In 1992 The EPA established a nickel MCLG and MCL of 100 µg/L in 1992, but this was removed in 1995. Presently, there are no EPA enforceable water standards for soluble nickel in the U.S., only a health advisory RfD of 0.02 mg/kg/day.88 California currently has a PHG of keeping nickel levels in water at or below 12 µg/L.177

According to the California Environmental Protection Agency, elevated levels of nickel may exist in drinking water due to the breakdown and corrosion of nickel-containing alloys in valves and other equipment used in water treatment and delivery systems.177

The Guidelines for Drinking-Water Quality Management in New Zealand provide information related to typical nickel concentrations in the environment and in drinking water.178 According to the report on inorganic contaminants nickel concentrations in seawater are generally 1 µg/L and within distribution systems, drinking water contains less than 10 µg/L. That said these levels may rise to 500 µg/L occasionally due to contamination via plumbing fittings.178 179 The ATSDR toxicological report on nickel indicates that soil usually contains 4 to 80 mg/L nickel.180

The IARC identifies nickel compounds as a Group 1 carcinogen, meaning that it is “known to be carcinogenic to humans”.180 However, the Government of New Brunswick reports that while high concentrations of nickel are toxic, “the concentrations in water are not usually high enough to cause health concerns”.181

Health Effects

Digestive System

Stomach discomfort. The ATSDR reports that stomach discomfort may result from consuming drinking water with highly elevated levels of nickel, with side effects being reported among individuals who consumered water containing a nickel concentration that was 100,000 times greater than typical concentrations.180

Liver damage. The ATSDR reports that elevated nickel concentrations in drinking water may also affect the liver.180 Researchers observed decreased liver weight in rats and mice when exposed to 0.97 to 150 mg Ni/kg/day in the form of nickel chloride or nickel sulfate over the course of 28 days to two years.180

Solutions

1. Filtration

The U.S. Department of the Interior recommends reverse osmosis for reducing or removing nickel concentrations in drinking water.182

2. Ion Exchange

Ion exchange resins utilize a cation (positively-charged ion) to exchange acceptable ions from undesirable forms of dissolved nickel in water.55 According to the WHO, ion exchange resins are a recommended technology for the removal of nickel from water.55

8. Mercury

Mercury is one of the priority pollutants identified by the Clean Water Act of 1972.184 It can spread to the environment through the erosion of natural deposits, discharge from oil refineries and power plants, coal slurry ponds, and runoff (leachate) from landfills. The ATSDR reports that surface water mercury levels tend to be 5 ppt (parts per trillion), a level about 1,000 times lower than the “safe” drinking water standard (MCL and MCLG) of 2 µg/l.88 185 Young children are at a greater risk than adults for poor health effects associated with mercury exposure in excess of the EPA MCL because their bodies absorb mercury more readily.186

Mercury can exist in several forms: inorganic, organic, and elemental. Inorganic mercury is usually referred to as mercury salts because when mercury binds with other elements such as chlorine or sulfur, it appears as white powders or crystals; these compounds are most commonly found in water.187 Organic mercury (also known as methylmercury) is simply mercury bound with carbon and can be transformed from elemental mercury.188

The most abundant organic compound found in the environment is methylmercury (CH3Hg) and is a greater health hazard than inorganic mercury.185 Methylmercury is a major concern in water as it has been shown to bioaccumulate in both freshwater and saltwater fish.185

At one time, one of the most common uses of elemental mercury was in thermometers. However, most mercury thermometers have now been replaced with other heat-sensitive liquids or electronic thermal sensors. Other uses for mercury include household products such as fluorescent light bulbs, thermostats and some blood pressure devices.185

Health Effects

Urinary System

Kidney damage. The EPA notes that kidney damage is a possible result of exposure to elevated levels of mercury in drinking water.189

Digestive System

Stomach and large intestine damage. The ATSDR reports that animals orally exposed to long-term, high concentrations of methylmercury or phenylmercury experienced damage to the stomach and large intestine.185

Solutions

1. Filtration

The EPA reports that reverse osmosis is an effective treatment technology to remove or reduce mercury levels to below the MCL (2 µg/L).190

Additionally, the EPA states that activated carbon filters are an effective treatment technology to reduce or remove mercury from drinking water.190

Organic Contaminants

Organic contaminants are composed primarily of carbon and hydrogen and may contain other elements such as halogens (chlorine, fluorine, bromine), oxygen, sulfur, phosphorus, and nitrogen. Organic contaminants are found in trace amounts in ground and surface waters. Detection can be very difficult because quantifying such small amounts (parts per billion) requires sophisticated analytical equipment and methods such as Gas Chromatography (GC), Mass Spectrometry (MS), and ion chromatography (IC). Common sources of organic pollutants include processes related to industry and chemical runoff leaching into surface waters.

1. Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs)

Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs) are organochlorines in which at least one, but often many, chlorine atoms are attached to each carbon atom in two connected benzene rings.191 Historically PCBs were widely used as coolants and dielectric fluids because of their thermal capabilities and chemical inertness. A direct effect of their chemical resistance is that they do not breakdown easily, and have a varied half-life ranging from a few days to 450 days, depending on the degree of chlorination.191 PCBs are categorized as persistent organic pollutants (POPs) and have been phased out since the 2001 Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants, an environmental treaty that went into effect in 2004.192 The treaty names 12 POP chemicals (the “Dirty Dozen”) that signatory nations have agreed to reduce or eliminate (including the production, use and/or release).192 As of 2008, the list has been extended to add nine new POPs.193 The EPA regulates PCBs to an MCL of 0.5 µg/l and an MCLG of 0 in drinking water.194

Health Effects

Urinary and Endocrine Systems

Liver cancer. A public health statement on PCBs released by the ATSDR notes that occupational exposure to PCBs may be associated with liver cancer.195 Overall, there are several potential routes of human exposure to PCBs, one of which includes consumption of drinking water contaminated by PCBs.195

Endocrine System

Thymus gland problems. The EPA reports that serious thymus gland problems may result from chronic exposure to PCBs in drinking water at levels greater than the EPA MCL.17

Cancer. The EPA reports that chronic exposure to PCBs at levels exceeding the MCL may result in an increased risk of cancer.17

Integumentary System

Acne and rashes. The EPA reports that chronic or prolonged exposure to PCBs at levels above the MCL may result in severe skin changes (chloracne).17 The ATSDR’s Toxicological Profile for PCBs notes that adults exposed to high PCB levels may develop rashes and acne.195

Solutions

1. Filtration

The EPA reports that activated carbon is an effective treatment technology for removing or reducing PCB concentrations in drinking water to below the MCL of 0.5 µg/L.194

2. Vinyl Chloride

Vinyl chloride, the monomer for polyvinyl chloride (PVC) is another high production volume (HPV) chemical with more than 17 billion pounds produced annually.196 Its primary use is in PVC and copolymer synthesis. In the past, vinyl chloride was used as a refrigerant and as an ingredient in aerosols.197 198 Common sources of water contamination from vinyl chloride are industrial runoff and leaching into water sources. The primary source of leaching occurs through PVC pipes and associated building materials.199

Vinyl chloride is generally not a concern in surface water because it can volatize easily, meaning it readily dissolves into the atmosphere; however, removal from ground water sources is more difficult because it is not readily broken down in anaerobic conditions, is heavier than water, and may contaminate soil and enter the ground water supply.103 200 Health Canada informs consumers that exposure to vinyl chloride in drinking water, aside from ingestion, may result from inhalation and to a smaller extent, dermal absorption.200

According to the WHO, inhalation is the most common way individuals are exposed to vinyl chloride, but drinking water may also account for a substantial portion of daily intake in areas where the distribution network is made up of PVC piping with a high residual content of vinyl chloride monomer.55 The presence of vinyl chloride in the environment has been reported as a product of the degradation of chlorinated solvents, including trichloroethene and tetrachloroethene.201

Health Effects

Digestive and Endocrine Systems

Liver cancer. According to the EPA, long-term exposure to vinyl chloride in drinking water above the MCL could lead to an increased risk of cancer.17 The 12th Report on Carcinogens notes that studies have demonstrated an association between vinyl chloride exposure and liver cancer.202

Hepatic angiosarcoma. The NTP reports that numerous studies show an association between vinyl chloride exposure and cancer of the blood vessels in the liver (hepatic angiosarcoma).196

Endocrine System

Cancer. The EPA reports that prolonged exposure to vinyl chloride in drinking water at levels greater than the maximum contaminant level may increase risk of cancer.17

Nervous System

Neurological effects. Reviews from Health Canada indicate an association between vinyl chloride exposure and neurological effects.200 Much of the cited literature is for workers exposed to very high levels of vinyl chloride through inhalation. Known effects from exposure to vinyl chloride and neurological outcomes such as headaches, nausea, dizziness, visual and hearing disturbances, and loss of consciousness.198

Solutions

1. Filtration

The Illinois Department of Public Health notes that in-home activated carbon filters can remove most of the vinyl chloride from tap water.203 Health Canada recommends the use of counter-top style carbon filters as they can reduce vinyl chloride levels from 13 µg/L to well below 2 µg/L.200

2. Packed Tower Aeration

The EPA indicates that packed tower aeration is an effective method for reducing and removing vinyl chloride to concentrations under two µg/L.199

3. Tetrachloroethylene

Tetrachloroethylene, also known as PERC, is a chlorinated hydrocarbon used as a dry-cleaning solvent, an additive in textile processing, and a metal degreasing agent. Tetrachloroethene is listed as a priority pollutant under the U.S. Clean Water Act and is a high production volume chemical, with over 1 to 10 million pounds produced or imported in 2002.204 The EWG notes that tetrachloroethylene pollution to ground and surface waters mainly comes from its use in the metals, chemicals, leather tanning, transportation equipment, ammunition, and petroleum refining industries.205 Additionally, local sources include dry cleaning establishments and machine shops which are poorly regulated and geographically dispersed.205

Where water volatilization cannot occur or is unlikely to take place, tetrachloroethylene can persist for upwards of 30 days (half-life from three hours to 14 days, or even >30 days in still water). Additionally, tetrachloroethene does not appear to bioaccumulate in animals or food chains.103

A report from the WHO indicates that tetrachloroethylene concentrations in drinking water in Western European countries are generally below 1 µg/L, however concentrations up to 12.2 µg/L have been observed. High concentrations have been detected in some regions of the U.S. (up to 7.75 mg/L after a water disturbance event).206 A report from the EWG notes that in the U.S., about 800 water utilities have reported tetrachloroethylene in tap water since 2004, with the highest concentration of 15 µg/L found in Wisconsin.207 The EPA MCL for tetrachloroethylene is 5 µg/L with an MCLG of zero.208

Health Effects

Endocrine System

Cancers. The EPA notes that prolonged exposure to tetrachloroethylene at concentrations greater than the maximum contaminant level in drinking water may result in an increased risk of bladder cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma, and multiple meyloma.208 209

Digestive and Endocrine Systems

Liver cancer. The EPA notes that chronic exposure to tetrachloroethylene above the EPA MCL can lead to liver damage and possibly cancer.17

Solutions

1. Filtration

The EPA reports that granular activated carbon filters are an effective treatment technique for removing or reducing tetrachloroethylene to concentrations lower than the MCL of 5 µg/L when used in combination with a packed power aeration.208

2. Packed Tower Aeration

The EPA indicates that packed tower aeration is an effective method for reducing and removing tetrachloroethylene to concentrations under 2 µg/L.208

4. Styrene

Styrene is a HPV chemical widely used in the production of polystyrene (Styrofoam) and other plastics and is also a minor constituent of cigarette smoke and auto emissions.210 Drinking water may be contaminated by discharge from rubber and plastic factories as well as by landfill leaching.211

The California Office of Environmental Health Hazards Assessment (OEHHA) notes significant acute and chronic toxic effects observed in animal studies from exposure to styrene including “genotoxicity in vitro and production of various types of tumors”.212 Additionally, both the National Toxicology Program (NTP) and the IARC have listed styrene as a reasonably anticipated human carcinogen and a possible human carcinogen, respectively.196 213 The EPA MCL for Styrene is 0.1 mg/L.211

Health Effects

Digestive System

Liver problems. According to the EPA, consuming water with styrene levels above the MCL of 0.1 mg/L can cause liver problems.17

Reproductive System

Sperm damage. A summary of animal studies reported by the ATSDR indicates that sperm damage has been observed in rats exposed to high doses of styrene.214 Animal studies reported in the California OEHHA’s Public Health Goal (CAPHG) for styrene indicate that total epididymal spermatozoa count decreased at exposure levels above 400 mg styrene/kg per day.212

Solutions

1. Filtration

The EPA reports that granular activated carbon filters in combination with packed tower aeration is an appropriate technology for removing or reducing styrene concentrations in drinking water to levels below the maximum contaminant level.211

2. Packed Tower Aeration

The EPA indicates that packed tower aeration is an effective method for reducing styrene to concentrations of less than 0.1 mg/L.211

Petroleum Contaminants

Petroleum contaminants are products and byproducts derived from the mining, refining, and manufacturing of petroleum oils. According to the WHO, petroleum oils can generate multiple low molecular weight hydrocarbon compounds with low odor thresholds in drinking water.55 The specific contaminants that are of concern for drinking water are benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, and xylenes (BTEX), which together are commonly referred to as BTEX. BTEX substances are volatile, aromatic hydrocarbons associated with petroleum derivatives such as gasoline and fuel oil. The American Geological Institute notes that of major gasoline compounds, BTEX substances are the most soluble, making them common indicators of gasoline contamination in water.215

The EWG, who monitors events such as oil spills have identified several toxins common to these events including benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene, xylenes, chromium, lead, and trimethylbenzene.216 In addition to the immediate environmental and health dangers posed by oil spills, many of the contaminants that make up crude oil are unknown. For this reason, oil pipelines and other modes of oil transport need to be assessed for their potential health and safety risks.

BTEX contamination from oil spills poses a high risk to environmental health, resulting in many years of cleanup and remediation, and significant health risks including increased risk of and developmental disorders.217

1. Benzene

Benzene is widely used as a precursor to various materials such as detergents, dyes, pesticides, Styrofoam, nylon, and other synthetic fibers, in addition to being used as a solvent for phenol, cyclohexane, and ethylbenzene production. The CDC states that benzene is naturally found in crude oil, gasoline, and other substances such as cigarette smoke.218 Benzene contamination in drinking water is likely caused by industrial waste discharge, gasoline leaks from storage facilities, and air pollution (emissions).148

The EPA identifies benzene as a priority pollutant under the Clean Water Act.184 The ATSDR’s Toxicological Profile for Benzene notes that of the 1,684 contaminated sites listed on the National Priorities List (NPL), at least 1,000 have benzene contamination.219

The EPA currently regulates benzene to a maximum contaminant level of five µg/l in drinking water.220 The Australian Drinking Water Guidelines, on the other hand, state that no safe concentration for benzene in drinking water has been set and limit benzene to a maximum concentration of one µg/l for practical purposes as this is the limit of determination.221 Further reports from the EPA indicate that an increased risk of cancer may result from prolonged exposure to drinking water with benzene at concentrations greater than the MCL.17

Benzene source pollution can come from many things, including leakage from sub-surface fuel storage tanks.221

Health Effects

Cardiovascular System

Anemia. The EPA reports that exposure to benzene in drinking water at concentrations greater than the MCL may potentially be associated with anemia.17

Immune and Endocrine Systems

Leukemia. The ATSDR reports that benzene is a known human carcinogen and that occupational exposure may be associated with leukemia and possibly non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma and multiple myeloma, particularly at higher levels of exposure.219

Nervous System

Depression of the central nervous system. The ATSDR reports that “acute inhalation and oral exposures” of benzene are associated with depression of the central nervous system and other nervous system effects, such as headaches, dizziness, confusion, and unconsciousness.219

Solutions

1. Filtration

The EPA reports that granular activated carbon filters in combination with packed tower aeration are an effective treatment technique for the removal or reduction of benzene in water to levels below the MCL.220

2. Toluene

Toluene is very similar to benzene in both structure and properties and is a high production volume chemical. In the U.S., applications for toluene include solvents for paints and coatings, adhesives, inks, and dyes. Much like benzene, toluene is also a precursor for nylon and plastics such as polyethylene terephthalate (PET), and polyurethanes.222

Toluene, much like benzene, is not a common water contaminant and is most typically found near petroleum and gas deposits. The WHO reports that “concentrations of a few micrograms per liter [µg/L] have been found in surface water, groundwater, and drinking water.”223 The EPA MCL for toluene is 1 mg/l.224

Health Effects

Nervous System

Nervous system problems. ATSDR notes that daily, low-to-moderate occupational exposure to toluene can result in loss of appetite, memory loss, and hearing and color vision loss.222 In mice, drinking water contaminated with toluene led to various effects on levels of neurotransmitters, depending on the specific dose.222

Reproductive System

Birth defects. A recent ATSDR report notes that exposure to high levels of toluene during pregnancy may lead to birth defects and other health problems.222 The WHO also notes that toluene causes embryotoxic and fetotoxic effects.55

Solutions

1. Filtration

The EPA reports that granular activated carbon filters in combination with packed tower aeration are an effective treatment technique for the removal or reduction of toluene to meet the regulated MCL.224

3. Ethylbenzene

Ethylbenzene is a naturally occurring component of crude oil and is also a combustion byproduct. The majority of ethylbenzene is produced through reactions with benzene, using ethylene and aluminum chloride as catalysts.225 The significant level of production and use of ethylbenzene in industrial processes creates the potential for contamination of air, soil, and water sources.226 Contamination of water sources can occur through industry discharge and leaks from underground fuel storage tanks and other locations where there are concentrated concentrations of ethylbenzene. The ATSDR reports that ethylbenzene passes into the air easily from water and soil and can contaminate groundwater.226

Concentrations of ethylbenzene in drinking water are generally very low. The EPA reports that ethylbenzene in concentrations greater than the MCL of 700 µg/L. can result in a variety of negative health outcomes.227

Health Effects

Nervous System

Drowsiness, fatigue, and headache. The EPA reports that for short-term exposure, common health effects include drowsiness, fatigue, and headache.228

Damage to the central nervous system. Long-term exposures to ethylbenzene have the potential to cause damage to the central nervous system.228

Respiratory System

Respiratory irritation. The EPA reports that short-term exposure to ethylbenzene may lead to respiratory irritation.228

Urinary System

Kidney damage. The EPA reports that long-term exposure to ethylbenzene at concentrations greater than the MCL may result in kidney damage.17

Digestive System

Liver damage. The EPA reports that long-term exposure to ethylbenzene at concentrations greater than the MCL may result in liver damage.17

Solutions

1. Filtration The EPA reports that granular activated carbon filters are an effective treatment technology for the removal or reduction of ethylbenzene to levels below the MCL.227

4. Xylenes

Xylenes are HPV chemicals with 18 billion pounds produced in 2006 in the U.S.229 Typical applications of xylenes include solvents for the printing, rubber, and leather industries. They are also used as ingredients in paper and fabric coatings and as intermediates in plastic synthesis, much like the other BTEX substances. Common sources of xylene contamination include gasoline, paint thinners, and industrial runoff and leaching. Xylenes are typically reported as a total value because there are three isomers: meta (m-), ortho (o-), and para (p-).229

The WHO states that concentrations up to 8 µg/L have been reported in surface, ground, and drinking water.230 Additionally, levels of up to a few milligrams per liter have been found in groundwater polluted by point emissions.231 Xylenes, like ethylbenzene, also have the potential to penetrate plastic pipes via contaminated soil.231 However, the ATSDR notes that everyday exposure to background levels of xylenes haven’t been found to result in any health effects.229 The EPA MCL for xylenes is 10 mg/L.232

Health Effects

Nervous System

Nervous system damage. The ATSDR indicates that acute exposure to high levels of xylene can result in delayed responses to visual stimuli and impaired memory.229 Furthermore, both short- and long-term exposure to high concentrations can also cause nausea, dizziness, headaches, lack of muscle coordination, confusion, and changes in the sense of balance. However, the report notes that while xylene ingestion through contaminated water sources is possible and represents a potential area of concern, many of the studies exploring the health effects of xylene on humans are based on exposure through inhalation. Animal studies focusing on oral exposure seem to support trends observed in inhalation-based studies.229

Respiratory System

Respiratory difficulties. According to the ATSDR, short-term exposures to concentrations of xylene above the MCL can lead to nose and throat irritation, labored breathing, and impaired pulmonary function.229

Solutions

1. Filtration The EPA reports that granular activated carbon filters with packed tower aeration are an effective treatment technology for the removal or reduction of xylenes to below the MCL.232

Pesticides and Herbicides

Pesticides and herbicides are chemicals used to control, kill, or repel insects, rodents and fungi, and can eventually make their way into the water supply (Figure 5).

Figure 5: Water pathways for pesticides.233
expand this figure

The U.S. uses approximately 4.5 billion pounds of active pesticide ingredients in a typical year.234 Herbicides and pesticides are most commonly used in large-scale, industrial farming. Pesticides are also regularly used in public areas such as parks, in and around schools, office buildings and hospitals, as well as by homeowners struggling with pest control.234 From the 1960s through the 1990s, industrial, home and agricultural pesticide use increased by 50% and as of 2007 had slightly decreased according to the latest figures release by the EPA.235 236 In 1994, approximately 74% of Americans used some type of pesticide.237 As pesticide use has increased, so has the transport of chemicals into streams, where they may transfer up the food chain into fish and seep into groundwater. A U.S. Geological Survey from the 1990s detected pesticide compounds in nearly every stream in agricultural, urban, and mixed-use areas, and also in approximately 30 to 60% of the groundwater. However, tests of water wells indicated concentrations below human health benchmarks.237

Figure 6a: Occurrence of pesticides in U.S. water from 1992-2001, Data from the U.s. Geological survey.237
expand this figure
Figure 6b: Occurrence of pesticides in U.S. water from 1992-2001, Data from the U.s. Geological survey.237
expand this figure

When herbicides or pesticides are found in water supplies, they are not normally present in high enough concentrations to cause acute health effects.

However, there are concerns about long-term effects, and for their potential to cause chronic health problems.238 The United Nations Environment Program has found a large regional correlation between pesticide contamination and human health in the Aral Sea region, where runoff increased the incidence of “oncological, pulmonary, and hematological morbidity, as well as congenital deformities and immune system deficiencies”.238 The EPA has developed human health benchmarks for approximately 350 pesticides and herbicides in order to determine health risks.88 There are enforceable MCLs for several farm chemicals that have been linked to kidney, liver, gastrointestinal, and reproductive problems, cataracts, and cancer, including the herbicides dalapon and dinoseb, and the pesticides endrin and heptachlor.88

Figure 7: Occurrence of pesticides in U.S. water from 1992-2001, Data from the U.s. Geological survey.237
expand this figure

1. Atrazine

Atrazine is one of the most widely used herbicides in the U.S. and is one of the most common herbicides found in drinking water.239 The herbicide is applied to crops (most commonly to corn) to fend off weeds. Atrazine contaminates source waters through agricultural runoff and also tends to evaporate and re-deposit with rain. Atrazine is found at particularly high levels in drinking water during spring runoff.239

The current EPA MCL for atrazine in drinking water is 3 µg/L88 and in Canada it is 5 µg/L.240 The Australian Drinking Water Guidelines have a maximum contaminant guideline for atrazine of 20 µg/L.221

The Australian Drinking Water Guidelines indicate that through spillage or misuse, atrazine is not a health concern unless it is present in concentrations greater than 20 µg/L, and even minor excursions above this level do not pose health risks unless exposure is over a significant period of time.221

The WHO reports that concentrations in drinking water rarely exceed 2 µg/L, and are commonly well below 0.1 µg/L.55

Health Effects

Cardiovascular System

Cardiovascular system problems. The EPA reports that many years of exposure to atrazine at levels higher than the MCL could lead to cardiovascular system problems.17 241 The Australian Drinking Water Guidelines report that doses of 33 mg/kg of body weight/day resulted in increased heart rate, myocardial degeneration and a decreased heart weight in an animal study.221

Solutions

1. Filtration

The EPA reports that granular activated carbon filters are an effective treatment technology for removing or reducing atrazine concentrations to below the MCL.241

2. 2,4-D

2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic acid, more commonly known as 2,4-D, is a major herbicide applied to wheat, barley, oats, sorghum, rice, and sugarcane. The EWG notes that 2,4-D is also applied to golf courses and lawns.242 With such widespread use, 2,4-D is susceptible to running off or leaching into ground and surface water sources.242

The Australian Drinking Water Guidelines report that 2,4-D does not pose a health risk through spillage or misuse unless concentrations exceed 30 µg/L.221 The WHO reports that typical concentrations of 2,4-D in drinking water are usually below 0.5 µg/L, although concentrations as high as 30 µg/L have been observed.55 The EPA MCL is 70 µg/L.88

Health Effects

Endocrine System

Adrenal gland problems. The EPA reports that chronic exposure to 2,4-D in excess of the MCL may result in adrenal gland problems.17

Thyroid effects. In a recent memo responding to comments regarding the use of 2,4-D, the EPA reported that thyroid toxicity was a possible effect of high exposure to 2,4-D that needed additional testing to increase certainty.243 One human exposure study in males found that high exposure to 2,4-D was associated with hypothyroidism.244

Urinary System

Kidney problems. The EPA reports that chronic exposure to 2,4-D at levels greater than the MCL may result in kidney damage.245 The Australian Drinking Water Guidelines report that 3-month dietary studies in mice, rats, and dogs reported effects on the kidneys at doses of 45 mg/kg body weight/day, 5 mg/kg body weight/day, and 3 mg/kg body weight/day, respectively.221

Immune System

Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma. The California Environmental Protection Agency (Cal/EPA) cites research indicating that 2,4-D exposures in farmers can lead to non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma.246 However, typical exposure concentrations in these populations are much greater than those seen in drinking water. Health Canada reports that non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma is associated with concentrations of 2, 4-D at 70 to 460 µg/L in water and soil.247

Reproductive System

Sex chromosome loss. The EWG reports that some animal studies indicate that high exposures to 2,4-D are associated with genetic effects including sex chromosome loss.242 One such study found an increase in chromatid and chromosome breaks in male rats exposed to two different concentrations of pesticide formulation.248

Solutions

1. Filtration

The EPA reports that granulated activated carbon filters are an effective treatment technique for the reduction or removal of 2,4-D to below the established MCL.245 The WHO indicates that concentrations of 0.1 µg/L should be achievable through the use of granular activated carbon.55

3. Glyphosate

Glyphosate is a general use or non-selective herbicide used in many pesticide formulations including Roundup® and Rodeo®.249 As an herbicide, it is used to control a variety of broadleaf weeds and grasses in agriculture, lawns, roadsides, and forestry.249 Exposures to glyphosate may result from normal use and include spray drift, residue in food crops, and from runoff into drinking water sources. The EPA sets an MCL for glyphosate at 700 µg/L.250

Health Effects

Urinary System

Kidney problems. The EPA reports that some people who drink water containing glyphosate in excess of the MCL over the course of many years can experience kidney problems.251

Reproductive System

Reproductive difficulties. The EPA reports that reproductive difficulties are a possible health effect of long-term exposure to drinking water containing glyphosates in excess of the EPA MCL.17 251

Solutions

1. Filtration

The EPA reports that granular activated carbon filters are an effective treatment technique for the reduction or removal of glyphosate to levels below the MCL.251

4. Simazine

Simazine is another herbicide that is widely used in agriculture to control weeds.42 It is often combined with the herbicide atrazine to treat corn. Simazine is also used on deep-rooted crops such as artichokes, broad beans, and citrus plants, as well as in non-crop settings such as farm ponds and fish hatcheries.42 Acute effects from high levels of simazine exposure include decreases in weight and changes in blood.252

The WHO reports that simazine is typically detected in ground and surface water samples at concentrations up to a few micrograms per liter.55 The EPA MCL for simazine is 4 µg/L.253

Health Effects

Cardiovascular System

Blood damage. The EPA reports that exposure to high levels of the herbicide simazine is linked to changes in blood.254

Reproductive and Endocrine Systems

Mammary gland and ovarian tumors. Scientists have linked simazine with mammary gland tumors and ovarian toxicity in rats.255 Following long-term exposure in rats, simazine has been shown to increase the levels of estrogen in the blood along with the human growth hormone, in addition to decreasing levels of prolactin and progesterone.255 256

Solutions

1. Filtration

The EPA reports that granular activated carbon filters are an effective treatment technique for the removal or reduction of simazine in drinking water to levels below the MCL.254 The WHO indicates that the use of granular activated carbon should reduce water simazine levels to 0.1 µg/L.55

Taste and Aesthetics

In addition to mandatory water quality standards, the EPA has also established non-enforceable National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations (NSDWRs).18 The NSDWRs set secondary maximum contaminant levels (SMCLs) for 15 contaminants that are not known to cause adverse health effects at the EPA-identified concentrations. According to the EPA, when levels exceed the SMCLs color, taste, odor, and aesthetics of drinking water may be compromised.18 The elements that follow closely resemble the list provided by the EPA; any contaminant additions or exclusions from that list in the following section are based on contaminants identified by other major regulatory agencies throughout the world.

1. Total Dissolved Solids (TDS)

Total dissolved solids (TDS) are the remnants of both inorganic and organic matter that are dissolved in solutions.257 TDS differ from suspended solids in that the contaminants are dissolved so that they cannot be easily removed. TDS will affect the aesthetic qualities of water, including taste and appearance. Primary sources of TDS contamination include agricultural and residential runoff, leaching of contaminated soil and water source pollution from industrial or sewage treatment plants. Other common sources include storm water and roadway runoff. Because industrial and agricultural sources are primary pollutants, TDS are most commonly comprised of nitrates, sodium, potassium, chloride, calcium, and phosphates.257 The EPA secondary MCL for Total Dissolved Solids is 500 mg/L.88

Health Effects

Comfort and Focus

Taste and clarity. According to the EPA, high concentrations of total dissolved solids can make water unpalatable and can also impact water clarity.258

Solutions

1. Filtration

TDS levels can be reduced with the use of sediment filters that are in compliance with NSF International drinking water treatment unit (DWTU) standards and have verified claims for TDS reduction.76

Reverse osmosis systems certified for compliance with NSF International DWTU standards with verified claims for TDS reduction are effective for the reduction of TDS in drinking water.76

2. Suspended Solids

Suspended solids are referred to as sediment and are the visible impurities in water.259 Turbidity describes the effect of suspended particles or solids that cloud water or the deflection that occurs when light passes through a standard amount of water, measured in nephelometric turbidity units (NTU). Total suspended solids (TSS), on the other hand, measure the amount of matter in water, or the total dry weight of all non-dissolved solids in the liquid (mg/L).259

Water with high turbidity is not inherently unhealthy, although it can be aesthetically unappealing.260 Often, the solids are just sulfates and chlorides, which do no more than affect taste and appearance. However, elevated TSS levels may be indicative of problems in the filtration process, which may signify that other contaminants have not been adequately removed. Turbidity can provide food and shelter for pathogens in piping or distribution systems, possibly leading to waterborne diseases.260

The EPA has set the MCL for turbidity at less than one NTU for surface water systems that use conventional or direct filtration, indicating that at no time should turbidity levels exceed those limits.261 Samples for turbidity are expected to be less than or equal to 0.3 NTU in at least 95% of the samples taken in any month.262 Surface water systems that utilize slow sand or diatomaceous earth filtration must have water that at no time exceeds five NTU, with 95% of samples remaining under one NTU in any month. Lastly, surface water systems that use alternative filtration methods (other than conventional, direct, slow sand, and diatomaceous earth filtration) are at no time to exceed 5 NTU, while samples for turbidity are required to be equal to or less than 0.5 NTU in at least 95% of samples in any month.263 Some water supplies, including New York City’s, have obtained filtration waivers regarding the turbidity requirement by implementing extensive watershed control programs to preserve the quality of the source. These systems follow turbidity limits set at the state level.262

Health Effects

Digestive System

Nausea, cramps, and diarrhea. High turbidity has been associated with the growth of pathogens that may cause symptoms including nausea, cramps, and diarrhea.17

Nervous System

Headaches. High turbidity has been shown to promote the growth of pathogens that can cause headaches.17

Comfort and Focus

Appearance. High turbidity can make water appear cloudy and aesthetically unappealing.260

Solutions

1. Filtration

Sediment filters are an effective treatment technology for the removal of suspended solids in water.263 Manufacturer’s specifications should be considered when choosing the proper sediment filter.

Filters that have been certified for compliance with turbidity reduction claims (typically certified under NSF/ANSI Standard 53) will provide turbidity reduction to levels that meet the NSF standard for turbidity reduction.76

The EPA recommends diatomaceous earth as an effective treatment technique for the reduction or removal of turbidity in drinking water.264

3. Iron

Iron is the fourth most abundant element by weight found in the earth’s crust and commonly occurs in soil and rocks as oxides, sulfides, and carbonate materials.265 The WHO reports that iron concentrations found in natural fresh waters range from 0.5 to 50 mg/L.55

Iron in the water supply arises from natural deposits that dissolve in the watershed but can also be a result of “iron coagulants or the corrosion of steel and cast iron pipes”.55

The EPA suggests a non-enforceable secondary drinking water guideline for iron levels in drinking water of 0.3 mg/L.18 Information from the Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality Management of New Zealand provides a taste threshold for iron as low as 0.05 to 0.1 mg/L in water, and iron content can become objectionable above 1 mg/L.265

Health Effects

Comfort and Focus

Taste. Water concentrations of iron in excess of the EPA secondary MCL of 0.3 mg/L can have a metallic taste.18

Appearance. High iron concentrations may result in water with a rust-brown appearance and can cause staining of laundry and plumbing fixtures.265

Solutions

1. Filtration

The EPA reports that the use of activated carbon filters, distillation, and reverse osmosis can be used to remove secondary contaminants such as iron from drinking water.266

Specific filters such as Birm filters are recommended by Penn State’s College of Agricultural Sciences for removing iron in private water systems in Pennsylvania, with the EPA also endorsing their effectiveness.267 268

In addition, Greensand filters have been proven effective for the reduction and removal of iron in drinking water.269

2. Chlorination

The WHO reports that the addition of chlorine dioxide can be effective in controlling iron content in drinking water.270

3. Corrosion Control

EPA states that corrosion control is an effective method for addressing the presence of iron in drinking water.18

Chlorides are combinations of chlorine with other elements such as sodium, calcium or potassium. These compounds often naturally dissolve into the water from rocks, and can also enter water systems from fertilizer-polluted runoff.

4. Chlorides

The EPA suggests a non-enforceable secondary drinking water guideline for chlorides of 250 mg/L.88 Drinking water regulations in Japan, on the other hand, enforce a chloride ion limit of 200 mg/L.271

Health Effects

Endocrine System

Sodium chloride metabolism. Aside from their potential to impair sodium chloride metabolism, chlorides have not been detected as toxic to humans. Excessive chlorides in water may result in impaired sodium chloride metabolism which can lead to congestive heart failure.272 273

Cardiovascular System

Cardiovascular risks. Excessive chloride in drinking water may result in high sodium levels that can potentially pose cardiovascular risks for those who are on limited sodium diets due to blood pressure issues.95

Comfort and Focus

Taste. High concentrations of chlorides can give water an unpleasant mineral taste.272 Specifically, the EPA states that chloride levels in excess of the secondary MCL of 250 mg/L can result in a salty taste in water.18

Solutions

1. Filtration

The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services notes that reverse osmosis is an effective treatment technique for removing chlorides.274

1. Distillation

The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services notes that distillation is an effective treatment technique for removing chlorides.274

Aluminum is the most abundant metal on earth and is used in a wide array of domestic and industrial applications.

5. Aluminum

Aluminum sulfate (or alum) is also sometimes added during water treatment to remove suspended particles. While effective at removing suspended particles, alum can remain in the water after it reaches consumers. In some areas, aluminum that is naturally present in the soil can also enter the water system. Aluminum falls under the National Secondary Drinking Water Regulations (NSDWRs) and is limited under these guidelines to 0.05 to 0.2 mg/L.88

The WHO recognizes the positive association between aluminum exposure in drinking water and Alzheimer’s disease that has been established in some epidemiological studies.55 The WHO, however, states strong reservations about inferring a causal relationship due to confounding factors not being addressed in these studies. Furthermore, the WHO recommends a health-based value of 0.9 mg/L as a provisional tolerable weekly intake (PTWI) for an assumed 60 kg adult consuming 2L of water per day. Overall, aluminum residuals in large systems should not exceed 0.1 mg/L and should not exceed 0.2 mg/L in small facilities.55

Health Effects

Nervous System

Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease, and dementia. When present in drinking water at high concentrations, aluminum can result in neurological damage. Several studies suggest a possible link between aluminum intake and Parkinson’s disease, Alzheimer’s disease,275 276 and other forms of dementia.275 277 In a prospective cohort study of 3,777 elderly subjects, researchers observed an association between exposure to aluminum concentrations greater than 0.1 mg/L in drinking water and both dementia and Alzheimer’s disease. The relative risk of dementia among subjects exposed to the stated aluminum concentration was 1.99. Adjusted relative risk for Alzheimer’s among subjects exposed to aluminum concentrations greater than 0.1 mg/L in drinking water was 2.14.275

Comfort and Focus

Appearance. The EPA notes that aluminum levels above the secondary MCL of 0.05 to 0.2 mg/L can result in colored water.18

Solutions

1. Filtration

The Ohio Department of Health identifies reverse osmosis as a useful method for removing aluminum in household drinking water.146

6. Sodium

A constituent of table salt, sodium is abundant in the earth’s crust, slowly eroding into streams and rivers, and being carried to oceans where it accumulates.278 Many water softeners also add sodium to bind with and disable hardening minerals. Like iron, sodium is a vital nutrient, but unhealthy in high amounts.278 The New York State Department of Health recommends water with no more than 20 mg/L of sodium for those on severely restricted sodium diets, and a maximum limit of 270 mg/L for those on moderately restricted sodium diets.279 280 The EPA includes sodium in its Drinking Water Contaminant Candidate List (DWCCL) in order to examine and correct the current outdated guideline. The EPA recommends a Drinking Water Equivalency Level (DWEL or guidance level) of 20 mg/L for sodium. Sodium is currently listed as a Research Priority; upon more extensive research the EPA will re-evaluate whether or not sodium should remain on the CCL.281

Health Effects

Cardiovascular System

Increased blood pressure. Excessive sodium in drinking water may pose cardiovascular risks due to its ability to increase blood pressure in some people.95 278 Prolonged increase in blood pressure can lead to the development of hypertension.282

Comfort and Focus

Taste. Sodium levels in excess of 250 mg/L can affect the taste of water.18 In combination with high amounts of chlorides, sodium can make water taste salty.18 In combination with high amounts of sulfates, sodium can make water taste bitter.282

Solutions

1. Filtration

The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services notes that reverse osmosis is an effective treatment technique for removing sodium.274

2. Distillation

The New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services states that distillation is an effective treatment technique for removing sodium.274

Small amounts of manganese are required for a healthy diet, but higher amounts may cause neurological damage.283

7. Manganese

Commonly found in the earth’s crust as an ore, this element is important in the metallurgy industry. Manganese is also found in tea and many infant formulas.283

The EPA suggests a non-enforceable secondary drinking water standard of 0.05 mg/L for manganese.18 Canadian drinking water guidelines list an aesthetic objective for limiting manganese concentrations to ≤ 0.05 mg/L.284

Health Effects

Nervous System

Neurological damage. Very high levels of manganese, resulting from direct contamination of a water source, can result in mental disturbances and tremors, particularly in the elderly.285

National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences (NIEHS) funded researchers at Columbia University found a significant correlation between higher concentrations of manganese in drinking water and lower scores on tests of neurocognitive function.286

Comfort and Focus

Taste. According to the EPA, drinking water containing manganese in excess of the EPA MCL can have a bitter, metallic taste.18

Appearance. According to the EPA, drinking water containing manganese in concentrations greater than the EPA MCL can be black to brown in color.18

Solutions

1. Ion exchange

The New York State Department of Health recommends ion exchange (water softening) as a treatment method for water with high concentrations of manganese.279

2. Filtration

The EPA reports that the use of activated carbon filters and reverse osmosis can be used to remove secondary contaminants, such as iron, from drinking water.266

Specific filters, such as Birm filters are recommended by Penn State’s College of Agricultural Sciences for removing iron in private water systems in Pennsylvania.268

In addtition, Greensand filters have been proven effective for the reduction and removal of iron in drinking water.269

3. Distillation

The EPA reports that distillation can be used to remove secondary contaminants such as iron from drinking water.266

8. Zinc

Zinc is an important trace element for humans, and zinc deficiencies can impair the immune system and the ability to taste.287 Zinc occurs naturally in small amounts in most water supplies, but a presence in large amounts is usually a result of pollution from metal smelting or coal burning.287 The EPA suggests a non-enforceable secondary drinking water guideline for zinc of 5 mg/L.18

Health Effects

Digestive System

Fever, nausea, vomiting, stomach cramps, and diarrhea. Zinc poisoning is possible with prolonged consumption at a concentration of 40 mg/L or greater in adults 19 and over.288 The WHO reports that drinking acidic liquids that have been kept in galvanized containers can cause fever, nausea, vomiting, stomach cramps, and diarrhea.289

Comfort and Focus

Taste. The EPA reports that zinc concentrations in drinking water in excess of the secondary MCL can cause water to have a metallic taste.18 The WHO reports that water containing zinc at levels above 3 mg/L may not be acceptable to consumers.289

Appearance. When boiled, water containing zinc at 3 to 5 mg/L can develop a greasy film and appear opalescent in color.289

Solutions

1. Ion exchange

According to the U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, ion exchange resins are a recommended technology for removing zinc from water and one of the best treatment selections for use in removing zinc in municipal water systems.288 290

2. Filtration

The U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation identifies reverse osmosis as one of the best methods for removing zinc in municipal drinking water.288

3. Distillation

The U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation identifies distillation as a method for zinc removal from drinking water.288

4. Corrosion Control

The EPA states that corrosion control is a cost-effective method for treating zinc in drinking water.18

9. Sulfates

Sulfates are salts derived from sulfuric acid that occur naturally in many minerals and can erode into water supplies. Sulfates are used in the production of fertilizers, chemicals and textiles, among numerous other industries.291 The EPA sets a non-enforceable secondary drinking water standard for sulfates at 250 mg/L.291

Health Effects

Digestive System

Diarrhea. According to the CDC, ingesting large amounts of sulfates has been linked to diarrhea.292 The WHO notes that cathartic effects are reported when consuming drinking-water containing concentrations of sulfate exceeding 600 mg/L.291

Comfort and Focus

Taste. EPA reports that sulfate concentrations in excess of the secondary MCL can result in water with a salty taste.18

Solutions

1. Ion exchange

According to the U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, ion exchange is a useful method for removing sulfates from drinking water.293

2. Filtration

According to the U.S. Department of the Bureau of Reclamation, nanofiltration can remove approximately 98% of sulfates.293

Explanations of Solutions

Filtration

While disinfection treatments can reduce the risk of waterborne diseases, they do not address non-biological contaminants. A combination of different filtration technologies can address dissolved minerals, gases, chemical compounds, and suspended solids. The filtration methods described below are applicable at the building level and can be retrofitted to existing buildings or included in new construction.

Sediment Filters. As the first stage in most water purification processes, the sediment filter removes traces of silt and clay in the water by passing the water through tiny pores.294 This improves the appearance of the water but leaves dissolved minerals untouched. Although it does not reduce the quantity of many substances harmful to health, a sediment filter prepares the water for more efficient cleaning by all subsequent filters. Ceramic filters have extra fine pores and can trap some microbes but are generally not recommended for use in bacterially contaminated water.294

Activated Carbon Filters. “Activated” or oxygenated charcoal filters are highly porous carbon fixtures.295 They are often manufactured by heating carbon from sources such as coconut shells to several hundred degrees in the absence of oxygen.296 In this environment, the carbon cannot burn, but most of the other chemicals vaporize. The impurities leave behind a maze of passageways and openings, giving activated carbon some 500 square meters of surface area per gram.296 On this immense surface area, these filters adsorb (collect on the surface) many different chemicals as they attempt to pass through, eliminating not only tastes and odors, but also chlorine, chloramine, disinfectant byproducts, dissolved pesticides, and some pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs).295 297 Since the filters accumulate the impurities, the charcoal must be replaced after its pores fill up with contaminants.

Charcoal filters do not remove bacteria and protozoa, and can even help them propagate, because by removing the disinfectants, carbon filters create a viable environment in the water for microorganisms.294 Therefore, it is important that some disinfecting process follows all carbon filters, except regularly cleaned point-of-use filters. Running hot water through a carbon filter will often release the trapped contaminants.294

Birm Filter. Birm filters are used for removing iron as well as sulfur and manganese from water. They have a specialized impregnated filter media that causes the dissolved iron to oxidize and form an insoluble ferric oxide (rust).298 The filter media then contains the rust until flushing. Periodically, the filter will flush itself to remove all precipitated ferric oxide.298

Greensand Filter . Greensand filters are similar to Birm filters in that they remove and reduce iron and manganese (as well as hydrogen sulfide) concentrations in water.269 They operate under the same mechanism of oxidizing iron and manganese to form insoluble salts that precipitate out of the water and can be easily removed. Greensand filters use glauconite coated with manganese oxide to perform either continuous regeneration or intermittent regeneration or a mix of the two to remove iron and manganese.269

By forcing pressurized water through a microscopic mesh, reverse osmosis (RO) systems effectively remove all suspended solids, most microorganisms, and even many of the larger dissolved contaminants.164

Reverse Osmosis

RO systems remove arsenic, aluminum, barium, chloride, copper, fluoride, iron, lead, manganese, nitrate, sodium, and sulfate: substances that can affect the taste and quality of water.164 RO systems certified for cyst removal can decontaminate water infected with E. coli and Giardia, but the filtration device membrane may degrade over time, reducing biological effectiveness.164

RO treatment also eliminates disinfectant byproducts that arise from the use of chlorination but does not remove chlorine itself.295 In fact, a carbon filter or other device must remove chlorine prior to reverse osmosis filtration or the chlorine will damage the RO membrane.295 Dissolved gases such as odorous hydrogen sulfide, trihalomethanes, and some pesticides will pass through an RO filter.299

One downside of RO treatment is wastewater.164 RO systems can only reduce the dissolved pollutant concentration so much, and the remaining water is then rejected by the system. Depending on the scale, the quantity of lost water can vary dramatically; for small under-the-counter RO units, as little as 20% of the water entering the system is usable.164 While the rejected water is not potable, it is still safe for other uses such as watering plants or washing cars or sidewalks.

Disinfectants

Given the harmful effects of various biological contaminants (e.g., E. coli and protozoa) on human health, disinfection is a necessary step in making water safe for human consumption.300 The most widely used disinfectants in the U.S. include chlorine and chloramine, which are added to water at the level of municipal water supplies (not at the level of individual buildings) due to the high capital cost and complexity of the processes.92

Chlorination. The most common disinfectant used in municipal water systems is chlorine, which is a strong oxidizing chemical used to kill bacteria.301 According to the EPA, chlorine acts as a germicide by “altering cell permeability, altering cell protoplasm, inhibiting enzyme activity, and damaging the cell DNA and RNA”.301 Because chlorine reacts strongly with lipids in cell membranes, it is more effective at killing biological pollutants with high lipid concentrations, such as bacteria.301

Monochloramine is a form of chloramine commonly utilized by municipal water systems for the purpose of disinfection.98 Chloramines are used to provide longer-lasting water treatment as water travels through pipes to consumers.302 Although the use of chloramine was brought about in order to reduce the formation of dangerous disinfectant byproducts, chloramines only modestly reduce the levels of harmful trihalomethanes and haloacetic acids. In addition, the use of chloramines creates a variety of disinfection products that are as bad or worse than THMs,302 such as N-nitrosodimethylamine (NDMA), which is a probable carcinogen.302

Ozonation. Ozonation is another disinfection method that is in use in the U.S. It works similarly to chlorine in that it kills biological contaminants via oxidization. The residuals breakdown rapidly, reducing the concentration in the water at the point-of-use, but also reducing any residual cleansing capability.53

Ozone is more effective than chlorine in killing bacteria but is the least widely adopted disinfectant method in the U.S. due to its high cost compared to alternatives.53

Ultraviolet (UV) Sanitation

Bombarding water with ultraviolet (UV) light – usually near the 254 nm wavelength – can serve as an alternative to chemical disinfectant additives.303 The high-energy radiation damages the DNA of microorganisms, making it impossible for them to reproduce. In water with low turbidity, UV treatment is highly effective and leaves no chemicals in water. However, while the absence of disinfectants is beneficial for humans consuming the water, it means that there is no residual cleansing and the water could become re-infected if exposed to more germs. UV treatment pairs nicely with other filters because it works best in low-turbidity water, such as the type produced by an activated carbon filter, where it can act as a final sanitizing step once the carbon filter removes the antimicrobial chlorine.54303

Distillation

Distillation is a water purification technique whereby the water is boiled to produce vapor which then condenses as a liquid upon contact with a cool surface and is collected.95 It is an effective method for removing numerous contaminants including heavy metals, microorganisms, organic compounds, minerals, and nitrates.

Overall, if distillation is done properly, it can remove up to 99.5% of all impurities.

However, it may not remove contaminants that have a lower boiling point than water, as those will vaporize along with water. In addition, because minerals and some oxygen are removed, distilled water is often reported as tasting “flat.” Finally, the energy costs of operating distillation equipment are high due to the large amount of electricity needed for boiling and condensing the water.95

Ion Exchange

Ion exchange is a water treatment technique whereby an undesirable contaminant is removed by exchanging it with another compound that is non-objectionable, or less objectionable, than the contaminant.304 Both the contaminant substance and the exchanged compound have to be dissolved and carry the same electrical charge (positive or negative). One of the processes in which ion exchange is used is water softening, in which the ions in hard water (calcium, iron, magnesium, and manganese) are exchanged for potassium or sodium ions, resulting in “softer” water.304

Packed Tower Aeration

Packed tower aeration or packed column aeration is a “waterfall aeration process that drops water over a medium within a tower to mix the water with air”.305 During the process, water is broken down into small droplets, allowing for maximum contact with air in order to remove the contaminant. Pre-treatment to remove biological growth, iron, and solids in order to avoid clogging of the packing material, as well as post-treatment with corrosion inhibitors, may be needed in order to “reduce corrosive properties in water due to increased dissolved oxygen from the aeration process”.305

Corrosion Control

Much of the infrastructure used to deliver water is constructed of materials that may leach potentially harmful contaminants – such as lead, copper, and iron – into the water flowing through it. This is especially true in older cities and buildings, where aging water pipes and fittings are more likely to contain lead, which is particularly harmful to human health or be in a state of disrepair increasing the likelihood of leaching.

The addition of inorganic phosphates and pH control are customary methods for controlling corrosion and leaching. Public water systems usually add inorganic phosphates into drinking water in order to inhibit corrosion and leaching of lead and copper from pipes and fixtures.306 When added to water, corrosion inhibitors such as phosphoric acid, zinc phosphate, and sodium phosphate create orthophosphate, which not only forms a protective insoluble scale coating on the inside of service lines and household plumbing but also increases the pH (decreases acidity), thereby preventing corrosion and leaching.306 Although the FDA identifies inorganic phosphate additives in food as “generally recognized as safe,” the EPA concedes that the health effects of drinking water containing inorganic phosphates are unknown.307

We Are WELL

Questions?

We’re here to help.

Connect: info@wellcertified.com

Learn: www.wellcertified.com

  1. Silverthorn, Dee Unglaub. Human Physiology. 6th. Glenview : Pearson, 2013. ISBN: 0321750071.

  2. Institute of Medicine at The National Academy of Sciences. Dietary Reference Intakes for Water, Potassium, Sodium, Chloride, and Sulfate. Institute of Medicine, The National Academies of Arts and Sciences. Washington, D.C. : The national academies press, 2005. https://www.nap.edu/read/10925/chapter/1. ISBN: 0-309-09158-6.

  3. Environmental Protection Agency. Getting up to Speed Ground Water Contamination. United States Environmental Protection Agency. [Online] 2015. [Cited: March 6, 2017.] https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-08/documents/mgwc-gwc1.pdf

  4. World Health Organization. Drinking-water. WHO.int. [Online] November 2016. [Cited: April 21, 2017.] http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs391/en/

  5. Environmental Working Group. The Many Sources of Drinking Water Pollution. EWG’s Tap Water Database. [Online] n.d. [Cited: June 1, 2017.] https://www.ewg.org/tapwater/sourcesofwaterpollution.php#.Wc1QMhNSxTZ

  6. Environmental Protection Agency. Toxics Release Inventory (TRI) National Analysis. Washington, DC : s.n., 2015. https://www.epa.gov/trinationalanalysis/report-sections-2015-tri-national-analysis

  7. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Safe Water System. [Online] n.d. [Cited: June 1, 2017.] https://www.cdc.gov/safewater/chlorination-byproducts.html

  8. Behm, Don. Milwaukee marks 20 years since Cryptosporidium outbreak. Milwaukee Journal Sentinel. [Online] April 6, 2013. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://www.jsonline.com/news/milwaukee/milwaukee-marks-20-years-since-cryptosporidium-outbreak-099dio5-201783191.html

  9. University of California Davis. Contamination of Water and Soil by Sewage and Water Treatment Sludge. extonet.orst.edu. [Online] June 1997. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://extoxnet.orst.edu/faqs/safedrink/sewage.htm

  10. Environmental Protection Agency. Water: Basic Information about Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. water.epa.gov. [Online] December 13, 2013. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/disinfectionbyproducts.cfm

  11. World Health Organization. 25 Years of Progress on Sanitation and Drinking Water. World Health Organization. [Online] 2015. [Cited: March 6, 2017.] http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/177752/1/9789241509145_eng.pdf?ua=1

  12. United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations. [Online] 2015. [Cited: March 6, 2017.] http://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/water-and-sanitation/

  13. Leuven, Laurie J. Van . Water/Wastewater Infrastructure Security: Threats and Vulnerabilities. [ed.] R Clark, S Hakim and A Ostfeld. Handbook of Water and Wastewater Systems Protection. New York : Springer, 2011, pp. 27-46

  14. Environmental Protection Agency. Drinking Water Contaminants. epa.gov. [Online] November 29, 2014. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/index.cfm#List

  15. Environmental Protection Agency. Understanding the Safe Drinking Water Act. EPA.gov. [Online] June 2004. [Cited: April 24, 2017.] https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-04/documents/epa816f04030.pdf

  16. Environmental Protection Agency. Regulating Public Water Systems and Contaminants Under the Safe Drinking Water Act. Water: Regulation Development. [Online] September 11, 2013. [Cited: June 5, 2014.] http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/rulesregs/regulatingcontaminants/basicinformation.cfm

  17. Environmental Protection Agency. National Primary Drinking Water Regulations. epa.gov. [Online] n.d. [Cited: May 21, 2013.] https://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water/national-primary-drinking-water-regulations

  18. Environmental Protection Agency. Secondary Drinking Water Regulations: Guidance for Nuisance Chemicals. Water: Drinking Water Contaminants. [Online] May 31, 2013. [Cited: Feb 11, 2015.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/secondarystandards.cfm

  19. Environmental Protection Agency. Table of Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. United States Environmental Protection Agency. [Online] October 4, 2016. [Cited: February 27, 2017.] https://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water/table-regulated-drinking-water-contaminants

  20. Environmental Protection Agency. How EPA regulates drinking water contaminants. epa.gov. [Online] United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2015. [Cited: January 19, 2016.] http://www.epa.gov/dwregdev/how-epa-regulates-drinking-water-contaminants

  21. New York State Department of Health. Part 5, Subpart 5-1 Public Water Systems - Tables. health.ny.gov. [Online] n.d. [Cited: April 19, 2017.] https://www.health.ny.gov/regulations/nycrr/title_10/part_5/subpart_5-1_tables.htm

  22. Environmental Protection Agency. Water: Drinking Water Contaminants. water.epa.gov. [Online] Oct 29, 2014. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/index.cfm

  23. Environmental Protection Agency. Radionuclides. EPA.gov. [Online] n.d. [Cited: April 21, 2017.] https://www.epa.gov/radiation/radionuclides

  24. Environmental Protection Agency. Integrated Risk Information System (IRIS). [Online] May 29, 2014. [Cited: June 4, 2014.] http://www.epa.gov/iris/help_ques.htm

  25. Douglas Connect. Initial ontologies for toxicity data. OpenTox. Geneva, CH : European Union, 2009. http://old.opentox.org/data/documents/development/opentoxreports/opentoxreportd31. WP3-D 3.1

  26. Environmental Protection Agency. EPA’s Approach for Assessing the Risks Associated with Chronic Exposure to Carcinogens. EPA.gov. [Online] January 17, 1992. [Cited: April 21, 2017.] https://www.epa.gov/iris/epas-approach-assessing-risks-associated-chronic-exposure-carcinogens

  27. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Glossary of Terms. atsdr.cdc.gov. [Online] n.d. [Cited: April 21, 2017.] https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/glossary.html

  28. Environmental Protection Agency. Integrated Risk Information System: Caprolactam. epa.gov. [Online] October 31, 2014. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/iris_documents/documents/subst/0357_summary.pdf

  29. New Jersey Department of Environmental Conservation. Ground Water Quality Standard for Caprolactam. Trenton : Bureau of Water Quality Standards and Assessments, 2008. http://www.state.nj.us/dep/wms/bears/docs/caprolactam.pdf

  30. Trautmann, Nancy M. Assessing Toxic Risk, Student’s edition (Cornell Scientific Inquiry Series). s.l. : NSTA Press, 2001. ISBN: 0873552229

  31. Environmental Protection Agency. Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund Volume 1: Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A) Interim Final. Office of Emergency and Remedial Response, United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. : United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1989. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/rags_a.pdf. EPA/540/1-89/002

  32. Environmental Protection Agency. Choosing a Percentile of Acute Dietary Exposure as a Threshold of Regulatory Concern. EPA.gov. [Online] March 16, 2000. [Cited: April 21, 2017.] https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-07/documents/trac2b054_0.pdf

  33. Mayo Clinic. Water: How much should you drink every day? Nutrition and healthy eating. [Online] Oct 12, 2011. [Cited: Mar 6, 2013.] http://www.mayoclinic.com/health/water/NU00283

  34. State of Goverment of Victoria. Water - a vital nutrient. betterhealth.vic.gov. [Online] 2014. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/bhcv2/bhcarticles.nsf/pages/Water_a_vital_nutrient?open

  35. Bowen, R. Absorption of Water and Electrolytes. The Small Intestine: Introduction and Index. [Online] Colorado State University, October 10, 1995. [Cited: February 3, 2015.] http://www.vivo.colostate.edu/hbooks/pathphys/digestion/smallgut/absorb_water.html

  36. U.S. Geological Survey. The water in you. The USGS Water Science School. [Online] U.S. Department of the Interior, March 17, 2014. [Cited: February 3, 2015.] http://water.usgs.gov/edu/propertyyou.html

  37. Environmental Protection Agency. About the TSCA Chemical Substance Inventory. epa.gov. [Online] n.d. [Cited: April 21, 2017.] https://www.epa.gov/tsca-inventory/about-tsca-chemical-substance-inventory#whatistheinventory

  38. Environmental Protection Agency. Toxic Substances Control Act (TSCA) and Federal Facilities. EPA.gov. [Online] n.d. [Cited: April 21, 2017.] https://www.epa.gov/enforcement/toxic-substances-control-act-tsca-and-federal-facilities

  39. Environmental Protection Agency. Getting Up to Speed: Ground Water Contamination. EPA.gov. [Online] n.d. [Cited: April 21, 2017.] https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-08/documents/mgwc-gwc1.pdf

  40. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [Online] September 6, 2013. [Cited: February 27, 2017 .] https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm6235a3.htm?s_cid=mm6235a3_w

  41. Global distribution of outbreaks of water-associated infection diseases. Yang, Kun, et al. 2, February 2012, PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases, Vol. 6. http://journals.plos.org/plosntds/article?id=10.1371/journal.pntd.0001483#s4

  42. Natural Resources Defense Council. Common Tap Water Contaminants: Health Effects, Treatment, and Recommendations. [book auth.] Erik Olson. What’s on Tap: Grading Drinking Water in U.S. Cities. Washington, D.C. : Natural Resources Defense Council, 2003, pp. 44-73. https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/whatsontap.pdf

  43. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Drinking Water FAQ. CDC.gov. [Online] n.d. [Cited: April 21, 2017.] https://www.cdc.gov/healthywater/drinking/public/drinking-water-faq.html

  44. New York City Department of Environmental Protection. New York City 2014 Drinking Water Supply and Quality Report. New York City. New York : New York City, 2014. http://www.nyc.gov/html/dep/pdf/wsstate14.pdf

  45. Environmental Protection Agency. E. coli and Total Coliform Detection in Drinking Water. EPA.gov. [Online] April 2012. [Cited: April 21, 2017.] https://archive.epa.gov/nrmrl/archive-etv/web/pdf/p100eexn.pdf

  46. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. General Information E.coli (Escherichia coli). cdc.gov. [Online] United States Department of Health and Human Services , Dec 1, 2014. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://www.cdc.gov/ecoli/general/index.html

  47. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Escherichia coli O157:H7 and other Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC). Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States Department of Health and Human Services. Atlanta, GA : Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011. https://www.cdc.gov/ecoli/general/index.html

  48. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Enteric Disease Surveillance: STEC Surveillance Overview. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [Online] 2012. [Cited: March 6, 2017.] https://www.cdc.gov/ncezid/dfwed/pdfs/national-stec-surveillance-overiew-508c.pdf

  49. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli & Food Safety. [Online] n.d. [Cited: April 21, 2017.] https://www.cdc.gov/features/ecoliinfection/

  50. World Health Organization. E. Coli. World Health Organization. [Online] October 2016. [Cited: March 8, 2017.] http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs125/en/

  51. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. A Guide to Drinking Water Treatment Technologies for Household Use. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States Department of Health and Human Services. Atlanta, GA : Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2008. https://www.cdc.gov/healthywater/pdf/drinking/household_water_treatment.pdf

  52. Environmental Protection Agency. Wastewater Technology Fact Sheet Chlorine Disinfection. EPA.gov. [Online] September 1999. [Cited: 25 2017, April.] https://www3.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/chlo.pdf

  53. Environmental Protection Agency. Wastewater Technology Fact Sheet: Ozone Disinfection. Office of Water, United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington D.C. : United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1999. https://www3.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/ozon.pdf

  54. Environmental Protection Agency. Wastewater Technology Fact Sheet: Ultraviolet Disinfection. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington D.C. : United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1999. https://www3.epa.gov/npdes/pubs/uv.pdf

  55. World Health Organization. Guidelines for drinking-water quality, 4th Edition. World Health Organization. Geneva, CH : World Health Organization, 2011. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/2011/dwq_guidelines/en/. ISBN 978 92 4 154815 1

  56. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Parasites - Giardia. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [Online] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, March 08, 2011. [Cited: February 12, 2015.] http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/giardia/

  57. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Parasites Cyrptosporidium. cdc.gov. [Online] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, November 2, 2010. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/crypto/gen_info/infect.html

  58. Painter, Julia E, et al. Giardiasis Surveillance: United States, 2011-2012. CDC.gov. [Online] May 1, 2015. [Cited: April 24, 2017.] https://www.cdc.gov/MMWR/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6403a2.htm

  59. Mayo Clinic. Giardia Infection (Giardiasis): Risk Factors. Diseases and Conditions. [Online] Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, November 14, 2012. [Cited: February 3, 2015.] http://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/giardia-infection/basics/risk-factors/con-20024686

  60. Environmental Protection Agency. Water Quality Standards Academy: Human Health Ambient Water Quality Criteria. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington D.C. : United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2011. https://www.epa.gov/wqs-tech/supplemental-module-human-health-ambient-water-quality-criteria

  61. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Publications. Morbidity and Mortality weekly report. [Online] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, May 1, 2015. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/ss6403a1.htm

  62. Cryptosporidiosis surveillance and water-borne outbreaks in Europe. Euro Surveillance. 5, May 2007, Euro Surveillance, Vol. 12. http://www.eurosurveillance.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=711

  63. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Emerging Infectious Diseases. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [Online] April 2003. [Cited: February 27, 2017 .] https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/9/4/02-0417_article

  64. Large outbreak of Cryptosporidium hominis infection transmitted through the public water supply, Sweden. Widerstöm, Micael, et al. 4, s.l. : Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, April 2014, Emerging Infection Diseases, Vol. 20. https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/eid/article/20/4/12-1415_article

  65. Minnesota Department of Health. Cryptosporidium. health.state.mn.us. [Online] March 5, 2014. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/water/factsheet/com/cryptosporidium.html

  66. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cyclosporiasis Outbreak Investigations — United States, 2013 (Final Update). Parasites - Cyclosporiasis (Cyclospora Infection). [Online] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, December 2, 2013. [Cited: February 3, 2015.] http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/cyclosporiasis/outbreaks/investigation-2013.html

  67. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Chapter 2: The pre-travel consultation. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [Online] July 10, 2015. [Cited: March 8, 2017.] https://wwwnc.cdc.gov/travel/yellowbook/2016/the-pre-travel-consultation/travelers-diarrhea

  68. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Cyclosporiasis FAQs. cdc.gov. [Online] January 10, 2013. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/cyclosporiasis/gen_info/faqs.html

  69. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Parasites-Giardia. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [Online] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, July 13, 2012. [Cited: February 12, 2015.] http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/giardia/disease.html

  70. New York State Department of Health. Cryptosporodiosis. health.ny.gov. [Online] October 2011. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] https://www.health.ny.gov/diseases/communicable/cryptosporidiosis/fact_sheet.htm.

  71. Environmental Protection Agency. Cryptosporidium: Drinking Water Health Advisory. Environmental Protection Agency. [Online] March 2001. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-10/documents/cryptosporidium-report.pdf

  72. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Epidemiology & Risk Factors. Parasites - Acanthamoeba - Granulomatous Amebic Encephalitis (GAE); Keratitis. [Online] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, August 24, 2012. [Cited: February 4, 2015.] http://www.cdc.gov/parasites/acanthamoeba/epi.html

  73. An update on Acanthamoeba keratitis: diagnosis, pathogenesis and treatment. Lorenzo-Morales, Jacob, Khan, Naveed A. and Walochnik, Julia. 10, February 18, 2015, Parasite, Vol. 22, pp. 1-20. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4330640/

  74. Environmental Protection Agency. Basic Information about Pathogens and Indicators in Drinking Water. Basic Information about Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. [Online] December 13, 2013. [Cited: November 20, 2014.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/pathogens.cfm

  75. Environmental Protection Agency. Surface Water Treatment Rules. epa.gov. [Online] n.d. [Cited: April 25, 2017.] https://www.epa.gov/dwreginfo/surface-water-treatment-rules. https://www.epa.gov/dwreginfo/surface-water-treatment-rules

  76. NSF International. Residential Drinking Water Treatment Standards. Filtration. [Online] NSF International, 2014. [Cited: November 25, 2014.] http://www.nsf.org/services/by-industry/water-wastewater/residential-water-treatment/residential-drinking-water-treatment-standards/

  77. National Aeronautics and Space Administration Earth Observatory. Harmful Bloom in Lake Atitlán, Guatemala. Earth Observatory: Images. [Online] National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Nov 22, 2009. [Cited: Jun 11, 2013.] http://earthobservatory.nasa.gov/NaturalHazards/view.php?id=41385. 41385

  78. Health Canada. Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality - Summary Table. Health Canada. [Online] November 14, 2014. [Cited: Feburary 13, 2015.] http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/water-eau/sum_guide-res_recom/index-eng.php

  79. Environmental Protection Agency. Cyanobacteria and Cyanotoxins: Information for Drinking Water Systems. United States Environmental Protection Agency, United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington D.C. : United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2014. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-08/documents/cyanobacteria_factsheet.pdf

  80. World Health Organization. Water-related diseases. Water Sanitation Health. [Online] 2001. [Cited: Jun 6, 2013.] http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/diseases/cyanobacteria/en/

  81. Environmental Protection Agency. Health and Ecological Effects. Environmental Protection Agency. [Online] December 8, 2016. https://www.epa.gov/nutrient-policy-data/health-and-ecological-effects

  82. HARRNESS. Harmful Algal Research and Response: A National Environmental Science Strategy 2005-2015. [ed.] J.S. Ramsdell, D.M. Anderson and P.M. Glibert. Washington : Ecological Society of America, 2005. http://www.whoi.edu/cms/files/HARRNESS_final_lowres_24103.pdf

  83. Environmental Protection Agency. Cyanobacteria and Cyanotoxins: Information for Drinking Water Systems. United States Environmental Protection Agency, United States Government. Washington, D.C. : Environmental Protection Agency, 2014. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-08/documents/cyanobacteria_factsheet.pdf. EPA-810F11001

  84. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Legionnaires’ disease fact sheet. [Online] Jul 18, 2016. [Cited: Sept 27, 2017.] https://www.cdc.gov/legionella/downloads/fs-legionnaires.pdf. CS267416-A

  85. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Facts About Legionella and Hot Tubs/Spas. [Online] May 5, 2013. [Cited: Sept 27, 2017.] https://www.cdc.gov/healthywater/pdf/swimming/resources/legionella-factsheet.pdf. CS235438-E

  86. ASHRAE Standing Standard Project Committee 188. Legionellosis: Risk Management for Building Water Systems . Atlanta : American Society of Heating, Refrigerating and Air-Conditioning Engineers, Inc, 2015. Standard 188-2015

  87. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Disinfection with Chlorine: Frequently Asked Questions. [Online] 2015. [Cited: May 1, 2017.] https://www.cdc.gov/healthywater/drinking/public/chlorine-disinfection.html

  88. Environmental Protection Agency. Drinking Water Standards and Health Advisories. Office of Water, United States Government. Washington D.C. : United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2011. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyNET.exe/P100H2N0.txt?ZyActionD=ZyDocument&Client=EPA&Index=2011%20Thru%202015&Docs=&Query=&Time=&EndTime=&SearchMethod=1&TocRestrict=n&Toc=&TocEntry=&QField=&QFieldYear=&QFieldMonth=&QFieldDay=&UseQField=&IntQFieldOp=0&ExtQFieldOp=0&XmlQuery=&File=D%3A%5CZYFILES%5CINDEX%20DATA%5C11THRU15%5CTXT%5C00000008%5CP100H2N0.txt&User=ANONYMOUS&Password=anonymous&SortMethod=h%7C-&MaximumDocuments=1&FuzzyDegree=0&ImageQuality=r75g8/r75g8/x150y150g16/i425&Display=hpfr&DefSeekPage=x&SearchBack=ZyActionL&Back=ZyActionS&BackDesc=Results%20page&MaximumPages=1&ZyEntry=2

  89. Environmental Protection Agency. Chloramine, Chlorine and Chlorine Dioxide. Basic Information about Disinfectants in Drinking Water. [Online] March 6, 2012. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/disinfectants.cfm

  90. World Health Organization. Trihalomethanes in Drinking-Water. World Health Organization. Geneva, CH : World Health Organization, 2004. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/chemicals/THM200605.pdf

  91. Wakefield, James C. Irritant Gases. [book auth.] David A. Purser, Robert L. Maynard and James C. Wakefield. Toxicology, Survival and Health Hazards of Combustion Products. s.l. : Royal Society of Chemistry, 2015, pp. 411 - 427

  92. Environmental Protection Agency. Basic Information about Disinfectants in Drinking Water: Chloramine, Chlorine, and Chlorine Dioxide. Water: Basic Information about Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. [Online] December 13, 2013. [Cited: November 4, 2014.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/disinfectants.cfm

  93. Environmental Protection Agency. Disinfection Byproduct Health Effects. Information Collection Rule. [Online] October 28, 2011. [Cited: September 9, 2014.] http://www.epa.gov/enviro/html/icr/dbp_health.html

  94. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Chloramines & Pool Operation. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [Online] May 4, 2016. https://www.cdc.gov/healthywater/swimming/aquatics-professionals/chloramines.html

  95. Dvorak, Bruce I. and Skipton, Sharon O. Drinking Water Treatment: An Overview. Lincoln, NE : Institute of Agriculture and Natural Resources at the University of Nebraska, 2014. http://extensionpublications.unl.eduassets/pdf/ec703.pdf

  96. G08-1489 Drink Water Treatment: Activated Carbon Filtration. Dvorak, Bruce and Skipton, Stephen. September 2008, Historical Materials from University of Nebraska-Lincoln Extension. http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/aglecfacpub/70/

  97. NSF International. Residential Drinking Water Treatment Standards. NSF International. [Online] 2017. http://www.nsf.org/services/by-industry/water-wastewater/residential-water-treatment/residential-drinking-water-treatment-standards

  98. Reducing Legionella Colonization of Water Systems with Monochloramine. Flannery , Brendan, et al. 4, April 2006, Emerging Infectious Diseases, Vol. 12, pp. 588 - 596. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3294698/

  99. Health Canada. Environmental and Workplace Health. Health Canada. [Online] October 2014. [Cited: June 01, 2017.] http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca/ewh-semt/pubs/water-eau/sum_guide-res_recom/index-eng.php

  100. Scottish Centre for Infection and Environmental Health. Chemical in Drinking Water: Chloramines. [Online] Scottish Centre for Infection and Environmental Health, July 2001. [Cited: November 29, 2014.] http://www.chloramine.org/articles_pdf/Chemicals_in_Drinking_Water_Chloramines.pdf

  101. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile for Bromoform and Dibromochloromethanes. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA : United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2005. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp.asp?id=713&tid=128. CAS#: 75-25-2; 124-48-1

  102. Environmental Protection Agency. Total Trihalomethanes, Haloacetic Acids, Bromate, and Chlorite. Basic Information about Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. [Online] March 6, 2012. [Cited: May 4, 2013.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/disinfectionbyproducts.cfm

  103. New Zealand Ministry of Health. Datasheet Index 2013 Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality Management Part 2.2: Organic determinands. Wellington, ON : New Zealand Ministry of Health, 2013. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0ahUKEwiR1bzju9zVAhVs34MKHTS9CjoQFgguMAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.health.govt.nz%2Fsystem%2Ffiles%2Fdocuments%2Fpublications%2Fdatasheet_2.2_organic_chemicals.doc&usg=AFQjCNGZ-SPNDitG-rQ-bef39DJSBQFscQ

  104. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. National Biomonitoring Program: Biomonitoring Summary. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States Department of Health and Human Services. Atlanta, GA : Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2013. https://www.cdc.gov/biomonitoring/biomonitoring_summaries.html

  105. Hrudey, Steve E. Chlorination Disinfection By-Products (DBPs) in Drinking Water and Public Health in Canada. National Collaborating Centre on Environmental Health, Public Health Agency of Canada. Alberta : s.n., 2008. http://www.ncceh.ca/sites/default/files/Chlorination_Disinfection_By-Products_2008.pdf

  106. Chemical and biological characterization of newly discovered iodoacid drinking water disinfection byproducts. Plewa, MJ, et al. 18, 2004, Environmental Science & Technology, Vol. 38, pp. 4713-4722. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15487777

  107. Barlow, Jim. Byproduct of Water-Disinfection Process Found to be Highly Toxic. News Bureau - Illinois. [Online] University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign , September 14, 2004. [Cited: February 4, 2015.] http://news.illinois.edu/news/04/0914water.html

  108. Comparative toxicity of new halophenolic DBPs in chlorinated saline wastewater effluents against a marine alga: Halophenolic DBPs are generally more toxic than haloaliphatic ones. Liu, Jiaqi and Zhang, Xiangru. 15, November 15, 2014, Water Research, Vol. 65, pp. 64-72. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S004313541400520X

  109. Greenemeier, Larry. Want Clean Water? Turn on the Lights. Scientific American. [Online] January 28, 2009. https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/clean-water-technology/

  110. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Monographs Volume 101. International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization. Lyon, FR : World Health Organization, 2013. http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol101/index.php

  111. Toxicology Data Network. Dichloroacetic Acid. TOXNET. [Online] United States National Library of Medicine, January 5, 2009. [Cited: December 31, 2014.] https://toxnet.nlm.nih.gov/cgi-bin/sis/search2/r?dbs+hsdb:@term+@rn+@rel+79-43-6

  112. Environmental Working Group. National Drinking Water Database: Study Findings. Washington : Environmental Working Group, 2009. https://www.ewg.org/tapwater/state-of-american-drinking-water.php#.WZRx6xiZNBw

  113. Oregon Department of Human Services. Health Effects Information: Haloacetic Acid. Environmental Toxicology Section Drinking water program. Portland : Oregon Department of Human Services, 2004. http://www.oregon.gov/oha/PH/HealthyEnvironments/DrinkingWater/Monitoring/Documents/health/haa.pdf

  114. Late Pregnancy Exposures to Disinfection By-products and Growth-Related Birth Outcomes. Hinckley, A.F., Bachand, A.M. and Reif, J.S. 12, 2005, Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 113, pp. 1808-13. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1314926/

  115. The Effect of Trihalomethane and Haloacetic Acid Exposure on Fetal Growth in a Maryland County. Porter, C.K., et al. 4, 2005, American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 162, pp. 334-44. https://academic.oup.com/aje/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/aje/kwi211

  116. Maternal Exposure to Drinking-water Chlorination By-products and Small-for-gestational-age Neonates. Levallois, P., et al. 2, 2012, Epidemiology, Vol. 23, pp. 267-76. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22317810

  117. Environmental Protection Agency. Toxicological Review of Dichloroacetic Acid. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington D.C. : United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2003. https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/crnr/p1006c1f.pdf. EPA 635/R-03/007

  118. World Health Organization. Dichloroacetic acid in drinking-water: Background document for development of WHO guidelines for drinking-water quality. World Health Organization. 2005. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/chemicals/dichloroaceticacid0505.pdf. WHO/SDE/WSH/05.08/121

  119. United States Department of the Interior. DBP: Haloacetic Acids Fact Sheet. Bureau of Reclamation, United States Department of the Interior. Washington : U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, 2009. https://www.usbr.gov/research/dwpr/reportpdfs/report068.pdf

  120. Household exposures to drinking water disinfection by-products: whole blood trihalomethane levels. Backer, LC, et al. 4, 2000, Journal of Exposure Analysis and Environmental Epidemiology, Vol. 10, pp. 321-6. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10981726

  121. Water Chlorination and Birth Defects. Magnus, P, et al. 5, 1999, Epidemiology, Vol. 10, pp. 513-7. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10468423

  122. Bladder Cancer and Exposure to Water Disinfection By-Products through Ingestion, Bathing, Showering and Swimming in Pools. Villanueva, C.M., et al. 2, 2006, American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 165, pp. 148-56. https://academic.oup.com/aje/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/aje/kwj364

  123. Water disinfection by-products and bladder cancer: is there a European specificity? A pooled and meta-analysis of European case-control studies. Costet, N, et al. 5, March 9, 2011, Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 68, pp. 379-385. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21389011

  124. A prospective study of spontaneous abortion: relation to amount and source of drinking water consumed in early pregnancy. Swan, SH, et al. 2, March 1998, Epidemiology, Vol. 9, pp. 126-133. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9504279

  125. Trihalomethanes in Drinking Water and Spontaneous Abortion. Waller, Kristen, et al. 2, 1998, Epidemiology Resources Inc., Vol. 9, pp. 134 - 140. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9504280

  126. Shannon, Elaine, Sharp, Renee and Pestano, JP. Water Treatment Contaminants: Forgotten Toxics in American Water. Washington D.C. : Environmental Working Group, 2013. http://www.ewg.org/research/water-treatment-contaminants#.WZR0UhiZNBw

  127. Symons, J., et al. Removing Trihalomethanes from Drinking Water - An Overview of Treatment Techniques. Washington D.C. : Environmental Protection Agency, 2002. https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_Report.cfm?dirEntryID=29716. EPA/600/J-80/360.

  128. United States Department of the Interior. DBP: Trihalomethanes Fact Sheet. Bureau of Reclamation. Washington D.C. : U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, 2009. https://www.usbr.gov/research/dwpr/reportpdfs/report068.pdf

  129. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations. Essential Nutrients: Minerals. FAO.org. [Online] n.d. http://www.fao.org/docrep/field/003/ab470e/ab470e06.htm

  130. Natural Resources Defense Council. Dirty Coal Is Hazardous to Your Health: Moving Beyond Coal-Based Energy. Natural Resources Defense Council. [Online] 2007. http://www.nrdc.org/health/effects/coal/coalhealth.pdf

  131. Salvato, J, et al. Environmental Engineering. s.l. : John Wiley & Sons, 2003. Vol. 3. ISBN: 0471418137

  132. Environmental Protection Agency. Ground Water and Drinking Water. Water: Drinking Water. [Online] October 6, 2014. [Cited: February 11, 2015.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/index.cfm#List

  133. Natural Resources Defense Council. Arsenic and Old Laws. Natural Resources Defense Council. New York : Natural Resources Defense Council, 2000. http://www.worldcat.org/title/arsenic-and-old-laws-a-scientific-and-public-health-analysis-of-arsenic-occurrence-in-drinking-water-its-health-effects-and-epas-outdated-arsenic-tap-water-standard/oclc/52959038

  134. U.S. Geological Survey. Arsenic in Ground-Water Resources of the United States. usgs.gov. [Online] January 9, 2013. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2000/fs063-00/fs063-00.html#HDR1

  135. EPA Re-establishes Lower Arsenic Limit for Drinking Water. CA Staff. 1, 2002, CA: A Cancer Journal for Clinicians, Vol. 52, pp. 2-3. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/store/10.3322/canjclin.52.1.2/asset/caac520002.pdf?v=1&t=j6f8xcfa&s=a9123b91c4cb68b11dd7b4b63df8526726e4983f

  136. World Health Organization. Arsenic in Drinking-Water. WHO.int. [Online] 2011. [Cited: April 24, 2017.] http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/chemicals/arsenic.pdf

  137. The Broad Scope of Health Effects from Chronic Arsenic Exposure: Update on a Worldwide Public Health Problem. Naujokas, M, et al. 3, s.l. : NIH, 2013, Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 121, pp. 295-302. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3621177/

  138. Environmental Protection Agency. Basic Information about the Arsenic Rule. EPA, Laws and regulations, Safe Drinking Water Act. [Online] 2012. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/rulesregs/sdwa/arsenic/Basic-Information.cfm#three

  139. Environmental Protection Agency. Arsenic in Your Drinking Water. Just the Facts for Consumers. [Online] March 2007. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://www.epa.gov/ogwdw/arsenic/pdfs/fs_arsenic_justthefactsforconsumers.pdf

  140. Subcommittee on Arsenic in Drinking Water, National Research Council. Arsenic in Drinking Water. National Research Council, National Academy of Sciences. Washington, D.C. : National Academy of Sciences, 1999. https://www.nap.edu/read/6444/chapter/1

  141. Arsenic immunotoxicity: a review. Dangleben, N.L., Skibola, C.F. and Smith, M.T. 73, 2013, Environmental Health, Vol. 12, p. 73. https://ehjournal.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/1476-069X-12-73. doi: 10.1186/1476-069X-12-73

  142. World Health Organization. Arsenic and Arsenic Compounds. World Health Organization. [Online] 2001. [Cited: March 8, 2017.] http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/42366/1/WHO_EHC_224.pdf

  143. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Arsenic Toxicity. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. [Online] January 15, 2010. [Cited: Feburary 13, 2015.] http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/csem/csem.asp?csem=1&po=11

  144. Harvard Medical School. Peripheral artery disease. Harvard Health Publications. [Online] April 2012. [Cited: March 8, 2017.] http://www.health.harvard.edu/heart-health/peripheral-artery-disease

  145. International Agency for Research on Cancer. Arsenic and Arsenic Compounds. International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization. Lyon, FR : World Health Organization, 2004. http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol100C/mono100C-6.pdf

  146. Ohio Department of Health. Reverse Osmosis. Private Water Treatment. [Online] Ohio Department of Health, September 2, 2014. [Cited: November 11, 2014.] http://www.odh.ohio.gov/odhprograms/eh/water/privatewatertreatment/RO.aspx

  147. Environmental Protection Agency. Basic Information about Copper in Drinking Water. Basic Information about Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. [Online] December 19, 2013. [Cited: January 2, 2015.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/copper.cfm

  148. Health Canada. Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality - Summary Table. Water and Air Quality Bureau, Healthy Environments and Consumer Safety Branch. Ottawa, ON : Health Canada, 2014. http://www.rdosmaps.bc.ca/min_bylaws/PublicWorks/Water/FedDrinkingWaterGuidelines2014Oct.pdf

  149. California Environmental Protection Agency. All Public Health Goals. Water. [Online] California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, April 2014. [Cited: January 22, 2015.] http://oehha.ca.gov/water/phg/allphgs.html

  150. Environmental Working Group. Copper. National Drinking Water Database. [Online] Environmental Working Group, 2011. [Cited: January 22, 2015.] http://www.ewg.org/tap-water/chemical-contaminants/Copper/1022/

  151. Acute gastrointestinal effects of graded levels of copper in drinking water. Pizarro, F, et al. 2, 1999, Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 107, pp. 117-121. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1566323/

  152. Community-based randomized double-blind study of gastrointenstinal effects and copper exposure in drinking water. Araya, Magdalena, et al. 10, July 2004, Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 112, pp. 1068 - 1073. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1247379/

  153. Environmental Protection Agency. Lead and Copper Rule. [Online] June 26, 2015. [Cited: November 18, 2013.] http://water.epa.gov/lawsregs/rulesregs/sdwa/lcr/index.cfm

  154. Connecticut Department of Public Health. Lead in drinking water. ct.gov. [Online] n.d. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://www.ct.gov/dph/lib/dph/drinking_water/pdf/lead.pdf

  155. Scientific Committee on Health and Environmental Risks. Lead Standard in Drinking Water. Brussels, BE : European Union, 2011. https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/environmental_risks/docs/scher_o_128.pdf

  156. Environmental Protection Agency. Lead in DC drinking water. Environmental Protection Agency. [Online] 2012. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://www.epa.gov/dclead/

  157. Environmental Protection Agency. Basic Information about Lead in Drinking Water. Basic Information about Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. [Online] March 6, 2012. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/lead.cfm

  158. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Nature’s Way to Prevent Tooth Decay: Water Fluoridation. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States Department of Health and Human Services. Atlanta, GA : Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006. https://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation/pdf/natures_way.pdf

  159. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Community Water Fluoridation. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [Online] July 10, 2013. https://www.cdc.gov/fluoridation/safety/health_effects.htm

  160. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile for Fluorides, Hydrogen Fluoride, and Fluorine. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA : United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2003. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/TP.asp?id=212&tid=38. TP11

  161. European Union. Flouridation. ed.europa.edu. [Online] 2010. [Cited: April 24, 2017.] https://ec.europa.eu/health/scientific_committees/opinions_layman/fluoridation/en/l-3/2.htm

  162. Beltrán-Aguilar, Eugenio D., Barker, Laurie and Dye, Bruce. Prevalence and Severity of Dental Fluorosis in the United States, 1999–2004. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. [Online] November 2010. [Cited: February 15, 2015.] http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/databriefs/db53.pdf

  163. Environmental Protection Agency. Basic Information about Fluoride in Drinking Water. Basic Information about Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. [Online] July 23, 2013. [Cited: January 2, 2015.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/fluoride.cfm#eight

  164. Dvorak, BI and Skipton, SO. Drinking Water Treatment: Reverse Osmosis. Lincoln, NE : University of Nebraska Extension, 2008. http://extensionpublications.unl.eduassets/pdf/g1490.pdf. G1490

  165. Blue babies and nitrate-contaminated well water. Knobeloch, L, et al. 7, 2000, Environmental Health Perspectives, Vol. 108, pp. 675-78. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1638204/

  166. Consumption of drinking water with high nitrate levels causes hypertrophy of the thyroid. van Maanen, J. 1-3, 1994, Toxicology Letters, Vol. 72, pp. 365-74. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0378427494900507

  167. Environmental Protection Agency. Basic Information about Nitrate in Drinking Water. Basic Information about Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. [Online] February 5, 2014. [Cited: December 1, 2014.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/nitrate.cfm#eight

  168. Environmental Protection Agency. Basic Information about Antimony in Drinking Water. Washington D.C. : Environmental Protection Agency, 2013. http://www.speciation.net/Database/Links/US-EPA-Basic-Information-about-Antimony-in-Drinking-Water-;i2525

  169. Office of the Chief Medical Officer of Health, New Brunswick. Facts on Drinking Water: Antimony. New Brunswick : Government of New Brunswick, 2014. http://www2.gnb.ca/content/dam/gnb/Departments/h-s/pdf/en/HealthyEnvironments/water/Antimonye.pdf

  170. Contamination of Bottled Waters with Antimony Leaching from Polyethylene Terephthalate (PET) Increases upon Storage. Shotyk, W. and Krachler, M. 5, 2007, Environmental Science and Technology, Vol. 41, pp. 1560-1563. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17396641

  171. Antimony leaching from polyethylene terephthalate (PET) plastic used for bottled drinking water. Westerhoff, P, et al. 3, February 2008, Water Research, Vol. 42, pp. 551 - 556. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0043135407005246?via%3Dihub

  172. World Health Organization. Antimony in Drinking-water. World Health Organization. Brussels, BE : World Health Organization, 2003. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/chemicals/antimony.pdf

  173. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile for Antimony and Compounds. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA : U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 1992. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp23.pdf

  174. Effects of Antimony on Rats Following 90-Day Exposure via Drinking Water. Poon, R., et al. 1, 1998, Food and Chemical Toxicology, Vol. 36, pp. 21-35. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278691597801202?via%3Dihub

  175. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxic Substances Portal - Antimony. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. [Online] January 21, 2015. [Cited: February 24, 2017.] https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/phs/phs.asp?id=330&tid=58

  176. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile for Antimony and Compounds. s.l. : U.S. Public Health Service, 1992. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp23.pdf

  177. California Environmental Protection Agency. Public Health Goal for Nickel in Drinking Water. Environmental Protection Agency, State of California. Sacramento, CA : State of California, 2001. https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/water/public-health-goal/nickel82001.pdf

  178. New Zealand Ministry of Health. Datasheet Index 2013 Guidelines for Drinking-water Quality Management Part 2.1: Inorganic determinands. Wellington : New Zealand Ministry of Health, 2013. https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=2&ved=0ahUKEwjXwveHvNzVAhXhx4MKHQjTAowQFgguMAE&url=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.health.govt.nz%2Fsystem%2Ffiles%2Fdocuments%2Fpublications%2Fdatasheet_2.1_inorganic_chemicals.doc&usg=AFQjCNHUHt6mSi4QHUF9qGD6a-08nrpkzw

  179. World Health Organization. International Programme on Chemical Safety Environmental Health Criteria 108: Nickel. inchem.org. [Online] 1991. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://www.inchem.org/documents/ehc/ehc/ehc108.htm

  180. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological profile for Nickel. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA : United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2005. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/ToxProfiles/tp15.pdf

  181. Office of the Chief Medical Officer of Health, New Brunswick. Facts on Drinking Water: General Chemistry and Metals. New Brunswick : Government of New Brunswick, 2014. http://www2.gnb.ca/content/dam/gnb/Departments/h-s/pdf/en/HealthyEnvironments/water/GeneralChemistry_Metalse.pdf

  182. United States Department of the Interior. Nickel Fact Sheet. Bureau of Reclamation, United States Department of the Interior. Washington : U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, 2009. https://www.usbr.gov/research/dwpr/reportpdfs/report068.pdf

  183. Environmental Protection Agency. Priority Pollutants. Water: CWA Methods. [Online] December 3, 2014. [Cited: January 4, 2015.] https://www.epa.gov/eg/toxic-and-priority-pollutants-under-clean-water-act. http://water.epa.gov/scitech/methods/cwa/pollutants.cfm

  184. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile of Mercury. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA : United States Department of Health and Human Services, 1999

  185. New Jersey Consumer and Environmental Health Services. Facts: Mercury in Drinking Water. Consumer and Environmental Health Services, State of New Jersey. Trenton : New Jersey Department of Health and Senior Services, 1998. http://www.atlantic-county.org/documents/health-topics/mercury_drinking_water.pdf

  186. Environmental Protection Agency. Inorganic Mercury. United States Environmental Protection Agency, United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington D.C. : United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2006. https://archive.epa.gov/region5/teach/web/pdf/mercury_inorg_summary.pdf

  187. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Mercury. CDC.gov. [Online] Month 2009. [Cited: April 24, 2017.] https://www.cdc.gov/biomonitoring/pdf/Mercury_FactSheet.pdf

  188. Environmental Protection Agency. Ground Water and Drinking Water. Environmental Protection Agency. [Online] October 4, 2016. https://www.epa.gov/ground-water-and-drinking-water/table-regulated-drinking-water-contaminants

  189. Environmental Protection Agency. Basic Information about Mercury (inorganic) in Drinking Water. Basic Information about Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. [Online] February 5, 2014. [Cited: December 2014, 2014.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/mercury.cfm#eight

  190. World Health Organization. Polychlorinated biphenyls (PCBs). Regional Office for Europe, World Health Organization. Copenhagen, DK : World Health Organization, 2000. http://www.euro.who.int/__dataassets/pdf_file/0016/123064/AQG2ndEd_5_10PCBs.PDF

  191. Stockholm Convention. The 12 initial POPs under the Stockholm Convention. [Online] 2008. [Cited: March 13, 2014.] http://chm.pops.int/TheConvention/ThePOPs/The12InitialPOPs/tabid/296/Default.aspx

  192. Stockholm Convention. The new POPs under the Stockholm Convention. Secretariat of the Stockholm Convention. [Online] 2008. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://chm.pops.int/TheConvention/ThePOPs/TheNewPOPs/tabid/2511/Default.aspx

  193. Environmental Protection Agency. Basic Information about Polychlorinated Biphenyls (PCBs) in Drinking Water. Basic Information about Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. [Online] February 5, 2014. [Cited: December 2, 2014.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/polychlorinated-biphenyls.cfm#eight

  194. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Public Health Statement - Polychlorinated Biphenyls. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA : United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2000. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/PHS/PHS.asp?id=139&tid=26

  195. National Toxicology Program. Report on Carcinogens 12th Edition. National Toxicology Program, United States Department of Health and Human Services. Research Triangle Park : United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2011. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21822324

  196. Environmental Working Group. Vinyl Chloride. National Drinking Water Database. [Online] Environmental Working Group, 2011. [Cited: June 23, 2014.] http://www.ewg.org/tap-water/chemical-contaminants/Vinyl-chloride/2976/

  197. Environmental Protection Agency. Vinyl Chloride. water.epa.gov. [Online] October 18, 2013. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://www.epa.gov/ttnatw01/hlthef/vinylchl.html

  198. Environmental Protection Agency. Basic Information about Vinyl Chloride in Drinking Water. Basic Information about Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. [Online] May 21, 2012. [Cited: December 2, 2014.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/vinyl-chloride.cfm#eight

  199. Health Canada. Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality: Guideline Technical Document Vinyl Chloride. Ottawa, ON : Minister of Health, 2013. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/publications/healthy-living/guidelines-canadian-drinking-water-quality-vinyl-chloride.html

  200. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile for Vinyl Chloride. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA : United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2006. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/TP.asp?id=282&tid=51

  201. United States Department of Health and Human Services. Report on Carcinogens. National Toxicology Program, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. 2011. http://www.iaff.org/HS/PDF/12th%20Report%20on%20Carcinogens%20-%202011.pdf

  202. Illinois Department of Public Health. Vinyl Chloride in Groundwater. Environmental Health Fact Sheet. [Online] Illinois Department of Public Health, July 23, 2012. [Cited: December 2, 2014.] http://www.idph.state.il.us/envhealth/factsheets/vinyl-chloride.htm

  203. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans. International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization. Lyon, FR : World Health Organization, 1995. http://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol64/index.php

  204. Environmental Working Group. Tetrachloroethylene. National Drinking Water Database. [Online] Environmental Working Group, 2011. [Cited: June 23, 2014.] http://www.ewg.org/tap-water/chemical-contaminants/?file=contaminant&contamcode=2987

  205. World Health Organization. Concise International Chemical Assessment Document 68: Tetrachloroethene. World Health Organization. Geneva, CH : World Health Organization, 2006. http://www.who.int/ipcs/publications/cicad/cicad68.pdf

  206. Environmental Working Group. Tetrachloroethylene. National Drinking Water Database. [Online] Environmental Working Group, 2004. [Cited: January 11, 2015.] http://www.ewg.org/tap-water/chemical-contaminants/Tetrachloroethylene/2987/

  207. Environmental Protection Agency. Basic Information about Tetrachloroethylene in Drinking Water. Basic Information about Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. [Online] February 5, 2014. [Cited: December 2, 2014.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/tetrachloroethylene.cfm#eight

  208. Environmental Protection Agency. Tetrachloroethylene (Perchloroethylene). Environmental Protection Agency. [Online] September 2016. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-09/documents/tetrachloroethylene.pdf

  209. Environmental Protection Agency. Styrene Fact Sheet. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington D.C. : United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1994. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-09/documents/styrene.pdf

  210. Environmental Protection Agency. Basic Information about Styrene in Drinking Water. Basic Information about Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. [Online] February 5, 2014. [Cited: December 2, 2014.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/styrene.cfm

  211. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment. Public Health Goal for Styrene in Drinking Water. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Environmental Protection Agency. Sacramento, CA : California Environmental Protection Agency, 2010. https://oehha.ca.gov/water/public-health-goal/public-health-goal-styrene

  212. International Agency for Research on Cancer. IARC Monographs on the Evaluation of Carcinogenic Risks to Humans Volume 82. International Agency for Research on Cancer, World Health Organization. Lyon, FR : World Health Organization, 2002. https://monographs.iarc.fr/ENG/Monographs/vol82/mono82.pdf

  213. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile for Styrene. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA : United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2010. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp.asp?id=421&tid=74

  214. U.S. Geological Survey. Environmental Health - Toxic Substances. toxics.usgs.gov. [Online] August 4, 2015. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://toxics.usgs.gov/definitions/btex.html

  215. Environmental Working Group. Poisons in the Pipelines: Tests Find Toxic Stew in Oil Spill. Environmental Working Group. Washington D.C. : Environmental Working Group, 2013. http://www.ewg.org/research/poisons-pipeline#.WZR-hBiZNBw

  216. Environmental Protection Agency. Outdoor Air - Industry, Business, and Home: Oil and Natural Gas Production - Additional Information. Improving Air Quality in Your Community. [Online] Aug 19, 2011. [Cited: Feb 11, 2015.] http://www.epa.gov/oaqps001/community/details/oil-gas_addl_info.html

  217. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Facts about Benzene. Emergency Preparedness and Response. [Online] Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, February 14, 2013. [Cited: February 11, 2015.] http://www.bt.cdc.gov/agent/benzene/basics/facts.asp

  218. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile for Benzene. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA : United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2007. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp.asp?id=40&tid=14

  219. Environmental Protection Agency. Basic Information about Benzene in Drinking Water. Basic Information about Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. [Online] September 17, 2013. [Cited: December 2, 2014.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/benzene.cfm

  220. National Health and Medical Research Council, National Resource Management Ministrial Council, Commonwealth of Australia. Australian Drinking Water Guidelines Paper 6: National Water Quality Management Strategy. National Health and Medical Research Council, Commonwealth of Australia. Canberra, AU : National Health and Medical Research Council, National Resource Management Ministrial Council, Commonwealth of Australia, 2011. https://www.nhmrc.gov.au/guidelines-publications/eh52

  221. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile for Toluene. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA : United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2000. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/TP.asp?id=161&tid=29

  222. World Health Organization. Water, Sanitation, and Health Chapter 12. [book auth.] World Health Organization. Guidelines for Drinking Water Quality. Copenhagen : World Health Organization, 2007, pp. 296-460

  223. Environmental Protection Agency. Basic Information about Toluene in Drinking Water. Basic Information about Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. [Online] May 21, 2012. [Cited: December 2, 2014.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/toluene.cfm

  224. California Environmental Protection Agency. Public Health Goal for Ethylbenzene in Drinking Water. California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, State of California. Sacramento, CA : State of California, 1997. https://oehha.ca.gov/media/downloads/water/chemicals/phg/etbx2c_0.pdf

  225. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Public Health Statement: Ethylbenzene. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Washington D.C. : United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2010. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/phs/phs.asp?id=381&tid=66

  226. Environmental Protection Agency. Basic Information about Ethylbenzene in Drinking Water. Basic Information about Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. [Online] February 9, 2014. [Cited: December 2, 2014.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/ethylbenzene.cfm

  227. Environmental Protection Agency. Consumer factsheet on: ETHYLBENZENE. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington D.C. : United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2009. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2016-09/documents/ethylbenzene.pdf

  228. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry. Toxicological Profile for Xylene. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Atlanta, GA : United States Department of Health and Human Services, 2007. https://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/toxprofiles/tp.asp?id=296&tid=53

  229. World Health Organization. Xylenes in Drinking Water. World Health Organization. Geneva, CH : World Health Organization, 2003. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/chemicals/xylenes.pdf

  230. Environmental Protection Agency. Permiation and Leaching. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington D.C. : United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2002. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2015-09/documents/permeationandleaching.pdf

  231. Environmental Protection Agency. Basic Information about Xylenes in Drinking Water. Basic Information about Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. [Online] February 5, 2014. [Cited: December 2, 2014.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/xylenes.cfm

  232. U.S. Geological Survey; Wyoming Department of Agriculture; Wyoming Department of Environmental Quality, Water Quality Division. Pesticides in Ground Water - Hot Springs County, Wyoming, 2003-2004. Washington, DC, USA : U.S. Department of the Interior, 2005. https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2005/3088/

  233. Environmental Protection Agency. Pesticides Industry Sales And Usage 2006-2007. Biological and Economic Analysis Division Office of Pesticide Programs Office of Prevention, Pesticides and Toxic Substances. Washington D.C. : United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2011. https://www.epa.gov/pesticides/pesticides-industry-sales-and-usage-2006-and-2007-market-estimates

  234. Natural Resources Defence Council. Our Children At Risk The Five Worst Environmental Threats to Their Health. Natural Resources Defense Council. [Online] 1997. [Cited: Jun 22, 2013.] http://www.nrdc.org/health/kids/ocar/chap5.asp

  235. Environmental Protection Agency. Pesticides. epa.gov. [Online] 2007. [Cited: January 19, 2016.] http://www.epa.gov/pesticides.

  236. Gilliam, Robert J and Hamilton, Pixie A. Pesticides in the Nation’s Streams and Ground Water, 1992-2001: A Summary. Sacramento, CA : United States Department of the Interior, 2006. https://pubs.usgs.gov/fs/2006/3028/pdf/fs2006-3028.pdf. Fact Sheet 2006–3028

  237. United Nations Environment Programme. The Aral Sea: Diagnostic Study for the Development of an Action Plan for the Conservation of the Aral Sea. United Nations Environment Programme,. Nairobi, KE : United Nations, 1993. http://www.worldcat.org/title/diagnostic-study-for-the-development-of-an-action-plan-for-the-conservation-of-the-aral-sea/oclc/77618079

  238. Natural Resources Defense Council. Atrazine: Poisoning the Well. NRDC.org. [Online] 8 22, 2009. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://www.nrdc.org/health/atrazine/

  239. Health Canada. Atrazine. Ottawa, ON : Government of Canada, 1993. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/publications/healthy-living/guidelines-canadian-drinking-water-quality-guideline-technical-document-atrazine.html

  240. Environmental Protection Agency. Basic Information about Atrazine in Drinking Water. Basic Information about Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. [Online] September 17, 2013. [Cited: December 3, 2014.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/atrazine.cfm#eight

  241. Environmental Working Group. 2,4-D. National Drinking Water Database. [Online] Environmental Working Group, 2011. [Cited: June 22, 2014.] http://www.ewg.org/tap-water/chemical-contaminants/24-D/2105/

  242. Environmental Protection Agency. Reponse to Public Comments Received Regarding New Uses of Enlist Duo on Corn and Soybenas. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. : s.n., 2014. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-10/documents/response_to_comments.pdf

  243. Hypothyroidism and pesticide use among male private pesticide applicators in the agricultural health study. Goldner, WS, et al. 10, 2013, Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Vol. 55, pp. 1171-8. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3795845/

  244. Environmental Protection Agency. Basic Information about 2,4-D (2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid) in Drinking Water. Basic Information about Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. [Online] December 13, 2013. [Cited: December 2, 2014.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/2-4-d-2-4-dichlorophenoxyacetic-acid.cfm#eight

  245. California Environmental Protection Agency. Public Health Goal for 2,4-Dichlorophenoxyacetic Acid in Drinking Water. Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, California Evironmental Protection Agency. Sacramento, CA : State of California, 2009. https://oehha.ca.gov/water/public-health-goal/final-public-health-goal-24-dichlorophenoxyacetic-acid-24-d-drinking-water

  246. Health Canada. 2,4-Dichlorophenoxiacetic Acid. Ottawa, ON : Government of Canada, 1991. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/publications/healthy-living/guidelines-canadian-drinking-water-quality-guideline-technical-document-2-4-dichlorophenoxyacetic-acid.html

  247. Chromosomal aberrations, micronuclei and nuclear buds induced in human lymphocytes by 2,4-dichlorophenoxyacetic acid pesticde formulation. Zeljezic, Davor and Garaj-Vrhovac, Vera. 1, July 15, 2004, Toxicology, Vol. 200, pp. 39-47. http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0300483X04001751?via%3Dihub

  248. Environmental Working Group. Glyphosate. National Drinking Water Database. [Online] Environmental Working Group, 2011. [Cited: June 22, 2014.] http://www.ewg.org/tap-water/chemical-contaminants/?file=contaminant&contamcode=2034

  249. Environmental Protection Agency. Glyphosate in Drinking Water. water.epa.gov. [Online] 02 09, 2014. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/glyphosate.cfm

  250. Environmental Protection Agency. Basic Information about Glyphosate in Drinking Water. Basic Information about Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. [Online] February 9, 2014. [Cited: June 22, 2014.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/glyphosate.cfm

  251. Environmental Protection Agency. Technical Factsheet on: Simazine. United States Environmental Protection Agency, United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington D.C. : United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2003. https://safewater.zendesk.com/hc/en-us/sections/202346217

  252. Environmental Protection Agency. Simazine in Drinking Water Basic Information. water.epa.gov. [Online] February 05, 2014. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/simazine.cfm

  253. Environmental Protection Agency. Basic Information about Simazine in Drinking Water. Basic Information about Regulated Drinking Water Contaminants. [Online] February 5, 2014. [Cited: December 2, 2014.] http://water.epa.gov/drink/contaminants/basicinformation/simazine.cfm

  254. Environmental Working Group. Simazine. National Drinking Water Database. [Online] Environmental Working Group, 2011. [Cited: June 22, 2014.] http://www.ewg.org/tap-water/chemical-contaminants/Simazine/2037/

  255. California Environmental Protection Agency. Public Health Goal for Simazine in Drinking Water. California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment, State of California. Sacramento, CA : State of California, 2001. https://oehha.ca.gov/water/public-health-goal/public-health-goal-simazine-drinking-water

  256. World Health Organization. Total dissolved solids in drinking-water. WHO.int. [Online] 1996. [Cited: April 24, 2017.] http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/chemicals/tds.pdf

  257. Environmental Protection Agency. 5.8 Total Solids. Water: Monitoring & Assessment. [Online] March 6, 2012. [Cited: February 11, 2015.] http://water.epa.gov/type/rsl/monitoring/vms58.cfm

  258. Environmental Protection Agency. Developing Water Quality Criteria for Suspended and Bedded Sediments (SABs). EPA.gov. [Online] 2003. [Cited: April 24, 2017.] https://www.epa.gov/wqc/developing-water-quality-criteria-suspended-and-bedded-sediments-sabs

  259. U.S. Geological Survey. Turbidity. The USGS Water Science School. [Online] March 17, 2014. [Cited: February 11, 2015.] http://water.usgs.gov/edu/turbidity.html

  260. United States Department of the Interior. Turbidity and Total Suspended Solids Fact Sheet. Bureau of land reclamation, Bureau of land reclamation. Washington D.C. : United States Government, 2009. https://www.usbr.gov/research/dwpr/reportpdfs/report068.pdf

  261. United States Department of the Interior. Managing Water in the West, Water Treatment Primer for Communities in need. Bureau of Land Manangement, United States Department of the Interior. Washington D.C. : United States Department of the Interior, 2010. https://www.usbr.gov/research/dwpr/reportpdfs/report068.pdf

  262. Environmental Protection Agency. Turbidity Requirements: IESWTR. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. : United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1999. http://www.dep.pa.gov/Business/Water/BureauSafeDrinkingWater/DrinkingWaterMgmt/Regulations/Pages/Interim-Enhanced-Surface-Water-Treatment-Rule.aspx

  263. Dvorak, Bruce I and Skipton, Sharon O. Drinking Water Treatment: Sediment Filtration. University of Nebraska-Extension Publications. [Online] December 2013. [Cited: April 24, 2017.] http://extensionpublications.unl.eduassets/pdf/g1492.pdf

  264. Environmental Protection Agency. Particulate and Turbidity Removal Technologies. Small Systems Treatment Technologies Research. [Online] January 16, 2013. [Cited: December 3, 2014.] http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/wswrd/dw/smallsystems/ptr.html

  265. New Zealand Ministry of Health. Datasheets for the guidelines for drinking-water quality management for New Zealand: Part 2.5: Aesthetic determinands. Wellington : New Zealand Ministry of Health, 2013. http://www.health.govt.nz/publication/guidelines-drinking-water-quality-management-new-zealand

  266. Environmental Protection Agency. Iron. Learn the Issues. [Online] March 1, 2013. [Cited: Feb 11, 2015.] http://www.epa.gov/nrmrl/wswrd/cr/corr_res_iron.html.

  267. Environmental Protection Agency. Removal of Arsenic from Drinking Water Supplies by Iron Removal Process. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. : United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2006. https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?dirEntryId=149606.

  268. Pennsylvania State College of Agricultural Sciences. Iron and Manganese in Private Water Systems. Water Quality. [Online] 2015. [Cited: February 11, 2015.] http://extension.psu.edu/natural-resources/water/drinking-water/water-testing/pollutants/iron-and-manganese-in-private-water-systems.

  269. Rader, L. How to Operate and Maintain Manganese Greensand Treatment Units. National Drinking Water Clearinghouse: On Tap Magazine. [Online] 2003. [Cited: February 11, 2015.] http://www.nesc.wvu.edu/pdf/dw/publications/ontap/2009_tb/how_to_manganese_greensand.pdf

  270. LeChevallier, Mark W. and Au, Kwok-Keung. Water Treatment and Pathogen Control: Process Efficiency in Achieving Safe Drinking Water. World Health Organization. Geneva, CH : World Health Organization, 2004. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/publications/9241562552/en/

  271. Wakayama, H. Revision of Drinking Water Quality Standards in Japan. Tokyo, JP : Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, 2004. http://www.nilim.go.jp/lab/bcg/siryou/tnn/tnn0264pdf/ks0264011.pdf

  272. World Health Organization. Chloride in Drinking Water. World Health Organization. Geneva, CH : World Health Organization, 2003. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/chloride.pdf

  273. Wesson, LG. Physiology of the human kidney. New York : Grune and Stratton, 1969. p. 591. ISBN: 0808905244

  274. New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services. Environmental Fact Sheet: Sodium and Chloride in Drinking Water. Concord, NH : New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services, 2010. https://www.des.nh.gov/organization/commissioner/pip/factsheets/dwgb/documents/dwgb-3-17.pdf. WD-DWGB-3-17

  275. Relationship between Aluminum Concentrations in Drinking Water and Alzheimer’s Disease: An 8-year Follow-up Study. Rondeau, V, et al. 1, 2000, American Journal of Epidemiology, Vol. 152, pp. 59-66. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2215380/.

  276. Aluminium and lead: molecular mechanisms of brain toxicity. Verstraeten, S and Aimo, L. 11, 2008, Archives of Toxicology, Vol. 82, pp. 789-802. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18668223

  277. The Potential Role of Aluminum in Alzheimer’s Disease. Campbell, Arezoo. Suppl 2, 2002, Nephrology Dialysis Transplantation, Vol. 17, pp. 17-20. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11904353

  278. Environmental Protection Agency. Drinking water advisory: Consumer acceptability advice and health effects analysis on sodium. epa.gov. [Online] February 2003. [Cited: March 2, 2015.] https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-09/documents/support_cc1_sodium_dwreport.pdf

  279. New York State Department of Health Bureau of Water Supply Protection. Individual Water Supply Wells - Fact Sheet #3: Recommended Residential Water Quality Testing. Troy, NY : New York State Department of Health, 2006. https://www.health.ny.gov/environmental/water/drinking/regulations/fact_sheets/fs3_water_quality.htm

  280. New York City Department of Environmental Protection. New York City 2009 Drinking Water Supply and Quality Report. City of New York. New York : New York City Department of Environmental Protection, 2010. http://www.nyc.gov/html/dep/pdf/wsstate09.pdf.

  281. Environmental Protection Agency. water.epa.gov. Sodium in Drinking Water. [Online] March 6, 2012. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://water.epa.gov/scitech/drinkingwater/dws/ccl/sodium.cfm

  282. South Carolina Department of Health and Environmental Control. Problems with Drinking Water. DHEC: Environment. [Online] 2014. [Cited: June 22, 2014.] https://www.scdhec.gov/HomeAndEnvironment/YourHomeEnvironmentalandSafetyConcerns/DrinkingWaterConcerns/CommonProblems/

  283. Manganese Neurotoxicity: A Focus on the Neonate. Erikson, Keith M, et al. 2, February 2007, Parmacology and Therapeutics, Vol. 113, pp. 369-377. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1852452/

  284. Health Canada. Summary of Guidelines for Canadian Drinking Water Quality. Federal-Provincial-Territorial Committee on Drinking Water, Health Canada. Ottawa, ON : Health Canada, 2003. https://www.canada.ca/en/health-canada/services/environmental-workplace-health/reports-publications/water-quality/guidelines-canadian-drinking-water-quality-summary-table-health-canada-2012.html

  285. Du, Julie. Drinking Water Health Advisory for Manganese. Washington D.C. : Environmental Protection Agency, 2004. https://www.epa.gov/sites/production/files/2014-09/documents/support_cc1_magnese_dwreport_0.pdf

  286. Graziano, Joseph. Health Effects and Geochemistry of Arsenic and Manganese. New York, NY : Columbia University, 2012. http://grantome.com/grant/NIH/P42-ES010349-14

  287. Environmental Protection Agency. United States Environmental Protection Agency. EPA.gov. [Online] July 2005. [Cited: April 24, 2017.] https://cfpub.epa.gov/ncea/iris/iris_documents/documents/toxreviews/0426tr.pdf

  288. United States Department of the Interior. Zinc Fact Sheet. Bureau of Reclamation, United States Department of the Interior. Washington D.C. : U.S. Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, 2009. https://www.usbr.gov/research/dwpr/reportpdfs/report068.pdf

  289. World Health Organization. Zinc in Drinking Water. World Health Organization. Geneva, CH : World Health Organization, 2003. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/chemicals/zinc.pdf

  290. Kocher, J, Dvorak, B and Skipton, S. EC03-703 Drinking water treatment : An overview. DigitalCommons@University of Nebraska - Lincoln. [Online] 2003. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=5760&context=extensionhist

  291. World Health Organization. Sulfate in Drinking-water. World Health Organization. Geneva, CH : World Health Organization, 2004. http://www.who.int/water_sanitation_health/dwq/chemicals/sulfate.pdf.

  292. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Health Effects from Exposure to Sulfate in Drinking Water. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, United States Department of Health and Human Services. Atlanta, GA : Enironmental Protection Agency, 1999. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyNET.exe/200021IN.TXT?ZyActionD=ZyDocument&Client=EPA&Index=1995+Thru+1999&Docs=&Query=&Time=&EndTime=&SearchMethod=1&TocRestrict=n&Toc=&TocEntry=&QField=&QFieldYear=&QFieldMonth=&QFieldDay=&IntQFieldOp=0&ExtQFieldOp=0&XmlQuery=&File=D%3A%5Czyfiles%5CIndex%20Data%5C95thru99%5CTxt%5C00000015%5C200021IN.txt&User=ANONYMOUS&Password=anonymous&SortMethod=h%7C-&MaximumDocuments=1&FuzzyDegree=0&ImageQuality=r75g8/r75g8/x150y150g16/i425&Display=hpfr&DefSeekPage=x&SearchBack=ZyActionL&Back=ZyActionS&BackDesc=Results%20page&MaximumPages=1&ZyEntry=1&SeekPage=x&ZyPURL

  293. United States Department of the Interior. Sulfate. Bureau of Reclamation, United States Department of the Interior. Washington D.C. : United States Department of the Interior Bureau of Reclamation, 2010. https://www.usbr.gov/research/dwpr/reportpdfs/report068.pdf

  294. Advanced Water Filters. Brief Overview of Residential Water Treatment Methods. Advanced water filters . [Online] 2013. [Cited: Mar 12, 2013.] http://www.advancedwaterfilters.com/faq.php?q_id=10

  295. San Francisco Public Utilities Commission. Questions Regarding Chlorine and Chloramine Removal from Water. San Francisco, CA : San Francisco Public Utilities Commission, 2010. http://www.sfwater.org/modules/showdocument.aspx?documentid=4125

  296. Minnesota Department of Health. Minnesota Department of Health. health.state.mn.us. [Online] n.d. [Cited: April 24, 2017.] http://www.health.state.mn.us/divs/eh/hazardous/topics/gac.html

  297. Montana Department of Environmental Quality. FAQs About PPCPs: Montana Focus. Helena, MT : Montana Department of Environmental Quality, 2008. https://deq.mt.gov/Portals/112/Water/WPB/SWP/Guidance/PPCPs_final_Aug%2708%20_2_.pdf

  298. Environmental Protection Agency. Removal of Arsenic from Drinking Water Supplies by Iron Removal Process. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington, D.C. : US Gov, 2006. https://cfpub.epa.gov/si/si_public_record_report.cfm?dirEntryId=149606

  299. Kneen, B, Lemley, A and Wagenet, L. Water Treatment Notes: Reverse Osmosis Treatment of Drinking Water. Ithaca, NY : Cornell Cooperative Extension, College of Human Ecology, 2005. http://waterquality.cce.cornell.edu/publications/CCEWQ-04-ReverseOsmosisWtrTrt.pdf. Fact Sheet 4

  300. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Disinfection with Chlorine & Chloramine. CDC.gov. [Online] n.d. [Cited: April 24, 2017.] https://www.cdc.gov/healthywater/drinking/public/water_disinfection.html

  301. Environmental Protection Agency. Combined Sewer Overflow Technology Fact Sheet: Chlorine Disinfection. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington D.C. : United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1999. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyNET.exe/P1001QUH.TXT?ZyActionD=ZyDocument&Client=EPA&Index=1995+Thru+1999&Docs=&Query=&Time=&EndTime=&SearchMethod=1&TocRestrict=n&Toc=&TocEntry=&QField=&QFieldYear=&QFieldMonth=&QFieldDay=&IntQFieldOp=0&ExtQFieldOp=0&XmlQuery=&File=D%3A%5Czyfiles%5CIndex%20Data%5C95thru99%5CTxt%5C00000021%5CP1001QUH.txt&User=ANONYMOUS&Password=anonymous&SortMethod=h%7C-&MaximumDocuments=1&FuzzyDegree=0&ImageQuality=r75g8/r75g8/x150y150g16/i425&Display=hpfr&DefSeekPage=x&SearchBack=ZyActionL&Back=ZyActionS&BackDesc=Results%20page&MaximumPages=1&ZyEntry=1&SeekPage=x&ZyPURL

  302. Natural Resources Defense Council. What’s On Tap? Grading Drinking Water in U.S. Cities. Natural Resources Defense Council. [Online] June 2003. [Cited: April 24, 2017.] https://www.nrdc.org/sites/default/files/whatsontap.pdf

  303. Environmental Protection Agency. Alternative Disinfectants and Oxidants Guidance Manual. Environmental Protection Agency. Washington D.C. : Environmental Protection Agency, 1999. https://nepis.epa.gov/Exe/ZyNET.exe/2000229L.TXT?ZyActionD=ZyDocument&Client=EPA&Index=1995+Thru+1999&Docs=&Query=&Time=&EndTime=&SearchMethod=1&TocRestrict=n&Toc=&TocEntry=&QField=&QFieldYear=&QFieldMonth=&QFieldDay=&IntQFieldOp=0&ExtQFieldOp=0&XmlQuery=&File=D%3A%5Czyfiles%5CIndex%20Data%5C95thru99%5CTxt%5C00000015%5C2000229L.txt&User=ANONYMOUS&Password=anonymous&SortMethod=h%7C-&MaximumDocuments=1&FuzzyDegree=0&ImageQuality=r75g8/r75g8/x150y150g16/i425&Display=hpfr&DefSeekPage=x&SearchBack=ZyActionL&Back=ZyActionS&BackDesc=Results%20page&MaximumPages=1&ZyEntry=1&SeekPage=x&ZyPURL

  304. New Hampshire Department of Environmental Services. Environmental Fact Sheet: Ion Exchange Treatment of Drinking Water. Concord, NH : New Hampsire Department of Environmental Services, 2009. https://www.des.nh.gov/organization/commissioner/pip/factsheets/dwgb/documents/dwgb-2-12.pdf. WD-DWGB-2-12

  305. National Drinking Water Clearinghouse. Tech Brief: Organic Removal. Morgantown, WV : National Drinking Water Clearinghouse, 1997. http://www.nesc.wvu.edu/pdf/dw/publications/ontap/2009_tb/organic_removal_DWFSOM47.pdf

  306. Environmental Protection Agency. Safe Drinking Water Hotline FY 2009 2nd Quarter Report. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Washington D.C. : United States Environmental Protection Agency, 2009

  307. Environmental Protection Agency. Why do water systems add phosphate to drinking water? What are the health effects of drinking water containing phosphates. Safe Water Support Portal. [Online] May 21, 2013. [Cited: November 3, 2015.] http://safewater.supportportal.com/link/portal/23002/23015/Article/24942/Why-do-water-systems-add-phosphate-to-drinking-water-What-are-the-health-effects-of-drinking-water-containing-phosphates

  308. The formation and control of emerging disinfection by-products of health concern. Krasner, Stewart. 1904, 2009, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society, Vol. 367. http://rsta.royalsocietypublishing.org/content/367/1904/4077.long

While oxidative processes such as ozonation, can effectively remove microcystins, the EPA does not recommend these processes for the removal of intracellular cyanotoxins because they may cause an unintentional release of bacterial toxins.83

The requested Read More content was not found.